Skip to main content

When the planet is "cognitively trapped" as "the environment"

"'Environment' is not something around and about human activities in an external sense; it is their medium," John Dewey wrote in 1949, and the "narrowing of the medium is the direct source of all unnecessary impoverishment in human living." Similarly, Vaclav Havel complained that the word "environment" suggests "that whatever is not human merely 'environs' or surrounds us and is therefore inferior to us, something we need care for only if it is in our interest to do so." He challenged us to reconsider that "the world is not divided into two types of Being, one superior and the other merely surrounding it."

"Sadly, in recent decades," Calvin Luther Martin wrote in 1992, "both the earth and the concept of wildness have become cognitively trapped as "the environment" — yet another thing for Homo to conserve and preserve."

One problem — call it a "spiritual" version of the problem — is that there is hubris in such a conceptual narrowing of our understanding that attempts to minimize the entire planet within the single word "environment" and to place ourselves at the center. This leads to another peril: attempting to control the planet before we understand it.

Rollo May wrote in 1969:

"The idea of 'mastering' nature or reality would have horrified the Greeks and would promptly have been labelled hubris, or inordinate pride which is an affront to the gods and a sure invitation for a man's doom. The Greeks always showed a respect which amounted to a reverence for the objective, given world. They delighted in their world--its beauty, its form, its endless challenges to their curiosity, its mysteries to be explored; and they were everlastingly attracted by this world....You can't outwit death anyway by 'progress' or accumulating wealth; so why not...let yourself delight and believe in the being you are and the Being you are part of?"

Even without that version of the problem, there is another problem. The simple idea of an "environment" makes the planet seem very boring, as if it is merely the air we breathe, the water in which we swim, the ground on which we walk. This makes it hard to attract interest in its scientific details and in the technical complexity of managing its potential "resources" for humanity.

And why should we have to use words to attract interest in something that is inherently valuable? Why should our concern for the maintenance of the building blocks of life turn itself into a rhetorical exercise or a marketing game? Are we trying to earn good grades in school? Are we trying to make money? What's the end, here, other than being able to to live in places that are clean, beautiful, and biologically productive, in some kind of harmony with other living beings, human and non-human? Why does that need require an elaborate story to justify it? Whose approval or permission are we seeking? Derrick Jensen argued in 2006:

"If I hit your thumb, you won't decide cognitively that getting hit by a hammer hurts. Not getting hit by a hammer has inherent value, no matter what you decide about it. * * * Drinkable quantities of clean water are unqualifiedly a good thing, no matter the stories we tell ourselves.”

Yet another version of the problem is that, even and especially when we understand the importance of the natural world, we do not have a grasp on how "to conserve and preserve" it (to use Calvin Luther Martin's phrase). How can we change our behavior? What would a right relationship to nature look like, and how can we better align ourselves with who we are supposed to be in that relationship? What would an ideal outcome be? If the task is too big and the results are not measurable, caught — as they are — in a necessarily tangled web of ecology, we are left with a discourse of problems instead of solutions, political conflict rather than collaboration, and fear instead of hope, as Jonathan Foley put it in 2017.

Sources

John Dewey, Knowing and the Known (1949). Quoted by Tom Hayden in The Lost Gospel of the Earth: A Call for Renewing Nature, Spirit, and Politics. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1996. p. 40.

Vaclav Havel. Quoted in Tom Hayden, The Lost Gospel of the Earth: A Call for Renewing Nature, Spirit, and Politics. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1996. p. 227.

Calvin Luther Martin, In the Spirit of the Earth: Rethinking History and Time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992. p 71.

Rollo May, Love and Will, New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1969. p 80.

Derrick Jensen. Endgame. Volume 1: The Problem of Civilization. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2006. p. 31.

"What's Limiting Us?" Jonathan Foley. GlobalEcoGuy blog (Medium). Oct. 10, 2017.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Castration at the Battle of Adwa (1896)

On March 1, 1896, the Battle of Adwa "cast doubt upon an unshakable certainty of the age – that sooner or later Africans would fall under the rule of Europeans." In this battle, Ethiopians beat back the invading Italians and forced them to retreat permanently. It was not until 1922 that Benito Mussolini would again initiate designs against Ethiopia; despite Ethiopia's defeat in 1936, the nation ultimately retained its independence. "Adwa opened a breach that would lead, in the aftermath of world war fifty years later, to the rollback of European rule in Africa. It was," Raymond Jonas wrote, "an event that determined the color of Africa." (p. 1) It was also significant because it upheld the power of Ethiopia's Christian monarchy that controlled an ethnically diverse nation (p. 333), a nation in which, in the late 19th century, the Christian Emperor Yohannes had tried to force Muslims to convert to Christianity. (p. 36)The Victorian English spelling…

Review of Cliff Sims' 'Team of Vipers' (2019)

After he resigned his position, Cliff Sims spent two months in Fall 2018 writing Team of Vipers: My 500 Extraordinary Days in the Trump White House. Many stories are told, some already well known to the public, some not. One buys this book, most likely, to gape at the colossal flameout spectacle that is Donald Trump, as with most things with Trump's name. Sims exposes the thoughtlessness, the chaos, the lack of empathy among his fellow insiders in the campaign and later in the White House, but he does not at all acknowledge the real consequences for ordinary Americans — there might as well be no world outside the Trump insider bubble, for all this narrative concerns itself with — and therefore falls far short of fully grappling with the ethical implications of his complicity.Previously, Sims was a journalist. "I had written tough stories, including some that helped take down a once-popular Republican governor in my home state," he says. "I had done my best to be acc…

It is not journalists' job to vet political nominees, but...?

The position of U.S. national intelligence director is open, following the resignation of Daniel Coats. John Ratcliffe withdrew his name from consideration on August 2, 2019, only five days after Trump nominated him. An article in The Guardian about why Trump picked Ratcliffe:Ratcliffe is a frequent Trump defender who fiercely questioned the former special counsel Robert Mueller during his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee hearing last week.Even as Mueller laid bare concerns that Russia was working to interfere with US elections again, Ratcliffe remained focused on the possibility that US intelligence agencies had overly relied on unverified opposition research in investigating the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.Unfortunately for Ratcliffe, he had embellished his credentials. According to Vox: He had "frequently boasted about overseeing the arrest of 300 illegal immigrants in one day at a poultry plant in 2008," but the operation was much smaller and his role w…