In a video posted by Elon Musk’s PAC, a $1M check recipient linked voting to receiving the money: “My name’s Ekaterina Deistler. …I did exactly what Elon Musk told everyone to do: sign the petition, refer friends and family, vote, and now I have a million dollars.”
— PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes.bsky.social) March 31, 2025 at 9:10 AM
[image or embed]
Musk on Tuesday’s election in Wisconsin: l feel like it's is one of those things that may not seem like it will affect the entire destiny of humanity, but I think it will
— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 7:59 PM
[image or embed]
Just before Musk's event in Green Bay tonight, the WI Supreme Court unanimously declined to bar him from handing out $1 million payments to voters
— The Downballot (@the-downballot.com) March 30, 2025 at 6:49 PM
[image or embed]
WisPolitics has a copy of the court's brief order: www.wispolitics.com/wp-content/u...
— The Downballot (@the-downballot.com) March 30, 2025 at 7:13 PM
[image or embed]
Musk has already committed the crime and the AG can get an arrest warrant any time he wants. This filing by the AG is intentionally wrong - he's pretending to do something, knowing that it does nothing. The AG is pulling a fast one on the public to avoid charging Musk with a crime.
— Mike Sims (@peltast1.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Musk is handing out checks right now with 50 cops watching him.
— Mike Sims (@peltast1.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Gee, it’s almost as if the AG seeking an injunction against the commission of a felony is procedurally incorrect. The warrant you need is for the ARREST of Elon Musk.
— Sam Halpert (@samhalpert.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 8:52 AM
[image or embed]
It’s not on the court. The AG is ducking his duties and set them up. bsky.app/profile/samh...
— Sam Halpert (@samhalpert.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 7:16 PM
[image or embed]
if you think this violates the law (and it very clearly does imo), you don't seek an injunction, you seek an indictment, given that the law makes it a class 1 felony. cowardice from the AG, cowardice from the courts, nobody wants the responsibility of actually enforcing the law. cowards all around
— Michael (@fleerultra.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 6:52 PM
[image or embed]
Truly lawyer and dem-consultant brained for people to think "showing the average person that rich and powerful are not above the law when they flagrantly commit crimes" is somehow bad for democracy or a political loser
— anerdylawyer.bsky.social (@anerdylawyer.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 7:01 PM
it is very clear, in light of the claims, that this was the "soft" approach.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 8:09 PM
[image or embed]
for the people in good faith (or even less) responding to this: if the world's richest man comes into your state and tries to buy your elections, and you are the attorney general of that state, you do everything you can—you think creatively about it—to stop him. to do less is to fail your state.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) March 30, 2025 at 8:57 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment