Wednesday, November 4, 2026
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
On U.S. midterm election day, Trump is making stuff up about cutting off aid to Israel
Nothing Trump says ever tracks with reality. He's ad-libbing.
TRUMP: We were giving Israel $4 billion, but it gets cut off at the end of the year KILMEADE: Why? TRUMP: Why? Because they don't need it, Brian. I asked them. Bibi Netanyahu brought it up. He said, 'I think it would be appropriate if we do not receive aid.'
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) November 3, 2026 at 8:39 AM
[image or embed]
What BiBi said was, if I'm not in power feel free to cut off aid, so they see my power!
— Poorer Richard (@worldlywise.bsky.social) November 3, 2026 at 8:41 AM
"We have a helper, and it's Israel" -- Trump says he has a "tremendous partnership" with Israel and adds "we have a tremendous fighting force" to keep "total control" of the Middle East
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) November 3, 2026 at 8:24 AM
[image or embed]
I think we just have to assume everything Trump says today is panicked improv.
— Schooley (@schooley.bsky.social) November 3, 2026 at 8:49 AM
[image or embed]
Monday, November 2, 2026
Disinformation: Misc stories going back to 2017
I collected some stories going back to 2017 and forgot to post them. See if they may be useful still.
In December 2017, without backing up her claim, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused journalists of "purposefully misleading" the public:
"There's a very big difference between making honest mistakes and purposefully misleading the American people, something that happens regularly. You can't say that it's an honest mistake when you're purposefully putting out information that you know to be false. Or when you're taking information that hasn't been validated, that hasn't been offered any credibility, and that has been continually denied by a number of people, including people with direct knowledge of an instance."
Anderson Cooper said he wondered how the press secretary has "credibility" telling news organizations to fact-check since he hadn't "heard this White House admitting a mistake at all."
Peter Baker and Sydney Ember wrote for the New York Times that "Mr. Trump has never backed down, for instance, from unsubstantiated claims that President Barack Obama wiretapped Trump Tower or that millions of illegal immigrants cast votes last year" and that last month he retweeted anti-Muslim content supposedly showing "a Dutch boy being beaten by a 'Muslim migrant' who in fact was not a Muslim migrant. Mr. Trump issued no correction, and Ms. Sanders at the time said it did not matter if the video were real..."
Honesty as part of character
"I spent the first two decades of my career as a social scientist studying liars and their lies," wrote Bella DePaulo on Dec. 8, 2017. The president's lies "are both more frequent and more malicious than ordinary people's." Two recent polls in October/November 2017 found that just over a third of American voters believe that Trump is honest. Indeed, based on The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" feature, the president lies to the public about six times each day, "far higher than the average rate in our studies" for people even even including both public and private statements. And for Trump, "that rate has been accelerating. Starting in early October, The Post's tracking showed that Trump told a remarkable nine lies a day, outpacing even the biggest liars in our research." Furthermore, in DePaulo's earlier studies about people more generally, the motivation for a lie is typically easily pigeonholed and only a tiny fraction of lies were "mean-spirited." For Trump's lies, however, she found that two-thirds were self-serving, half were cruel, and a quarter seemed to serve multiple purposes.
When you don't have good information, you can't make real choices
"Whether information is tightly controlled by a dictator or distorted by tech billionaires and the clicks of conspiratorial crackpots, its quality determines the quality of a democracy. When bad information constructs a fake reality, voters will make choices based on lies, conspiracy theories, and mass delusions. If you break the information pipelines, democracy will break—and that is currently happening in the United States.
Last April, an NBC News poll showed an astonishing Trump/Biden preference divide based on information consumption habits. Among voters who reported that they read newspapers, 70 percent favored Biden, compared to just 21 percent for Trump. Meanwhile, Trump had a distinct edge among those who reported that they didn’t follow the news, with a 53 percent to 27 percent edge. That’s compelling evidence that informational divides are the hidden fissure in American politics. Given that democracy relies on a shared sense of reality to solve problems through compromise, the splintering of that shared reality is arguably the most serious overarching problem facing American democracy."
—Brian Klaas, The Democratization of Information Production is Killing Democracy: The way we receive information about our world is unlike any previous generations of humanity. Paradoxically, it's destroying democracy—and Trump's America is the main canary in the coal mine., Brian Klaas, Jan 30, 2025
Other disinformation stories
"Fox News: The Transition From Unfair and Unbalanced to Dangerous." Craig Benedict. Polityke. Dec. 11, 2017.
"Fox News journalists were outraged and disgusted after Sean Hannity, the network's star host, campaigned with President Donald Trump on Monday night ahead of the midterm elections, more than half a dozen employees told CNN Business.
* * *
'We were all told that Hannity was going to interview the president, but no one that I spoke with expected what happened last night,' added a third senior Fox News employee. 'I'm aghast as are a number of other people.'"
— "'It disturbs me to my core': Fox News staffers express outrage over Hannity's rally appearance." Oliver Darcy. CNN, Nov. 6, 2018.
Jason Stanley, author of How Fascism Works, "said the news cycle’s lightning-fast pace in the social media age is helping President Donald Trump blur the line between truth and fiction" specifically insofar as "the accelerated news cycle undermines democratic institutions that rely on an informed electorate." Interviewed on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in October 2018, Stanley warned, "It’s an old tactic to attack the mainstream press, so there is no uniform reality on which to base our shared citizenship, so when we can just pick and choose among any news stream that fits our proclivities, we can just think that reality is, in fact, vacuous and it’s our team versus your team."
These “repeat spreaders” played a significant role in the spread of false rumors & conspiracy theories that metastasized as “the big lie” and motivated the violent events of January 6, 2021. I’ve described those dynamics here (and in papers under review): https://t.co/AK7dD5kXIu
— Kate Starbird (@katestarbird) October 6, 2022
For Democrats, the benefits of going on Fox are illusory at best: Few benefits, heavy costs to appearing on the GOP’s propaganda network. Matt Gertz, April 20, 2022
"She [Naomi Wolf] was just 'raising flags' and 'asking questions,' and then she invariably moved on. This is classic 'conspiracy without the theory,' as described by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum in their 2020 book, A Lot of People Are Saying, part of the growing body of literature attempting to make sense of the surge in belief in a wide range of off-the-wall, unproven claims."
— Naomi Klein. Doppelganger: A Trip into the Mirror World. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023.
Seth Abramson, "MAGA Radicals Got a Major Disinformation Reporting Center Shut Down for Exactly the Terrifying Reason You Might Expect. Here’s What to Do About It." Proof, June 16, 2024:
"...major media is doing less to report the reality of the American economy right now than it has in any of our lifetimes, almost certainly because of a dangerous feedback loop:
- If Americans think the economy is doing poorly, then
- whether or not it is, major media reporting otherwise is likely to anger rather than illuminate them (because we live in a time when we want the news to coddle our emotions rather than inform us), and
- major media is already struggling financially and can’t afford to anger its viewership, so
- it does not so much misreport the state of the economy as (a) wildly under-report it (both in terms of the number of reports it publishes and the comprehensiveness of each report), and (b) feels compelled to occasionally publish op-eds that use “weasel words”, incomplete data, false conclusions, and misleading framings to downplay the actually fairly strong economy we’re all living in right now.
Trump II: 2025...
See also: "Rightsplaining Reality: A linguistic perspective on Trump’s territoriality of truth," Martina Wiltschko, Medium, September 3, 2025
Of ongoing election denial in any election in which Republicans lose, Hauselman says:
"Overnight, [Spencer] Pratt goes to third [in the election count]. ... This is honestly [what they cite as] their evidence [of election fraud]. Because he dropped down a couple points overnight to the exact same spot where Trump had been in 2024, that is their evidence. Here we go: I can envision it, therefore it is. ... [This science professor is] now talking about how we'll never be able to prove any of this stuff, but we just somehow know that it's true. ... It'll only apply to the races that their guys lose."
— Jared Yates Sexton and Nick Hauselman, "Iran Out of Good Options," June 12, 2026 (35:28–36:28)
Sexton responds that MAGA operates on their own feelings:
"This is their [MAGA] worldview: What is true for them is capital-T True. [They maintain that] nobody else could feel different [from MAGA] unless they're corrupted, they're being paid by billionaires, they're possessed by demons, they're evil, they're a rapist, whatever it is. They [MAGA] have total control of reality, which is why, when you interact with one of these assholes, it becomes dangerous. They become aggressive. ... They control reality, and everyone either has to bend to it or they don't."
* * *
"You and I have seen elections that we were disappointed in. We're like: Well, fuck. ... Sometimes you lose an election and you have to deal with the consequences nad the fallout. But they refuse to. Everything has to be on their terms. So as a result, anything that happens — and it's not just elections. It's everything that happens in their life. If it doesn't happen the exact way that they want it to happen, it is a crime against them. It's a conspiracy against them. And that is the defining [inaudible: characteristic?] of the Right. Which is this brittle self-identity and also self-hatred of course that they project on everybody, and anything that inconveniences them has to be evil and it has to be a conspiracy against them."— Jared Yates Sexton and Nick Hauselman, "Iran Out of Good Options," June 12, 2026 (37:53–38:23, 43:04–44:00)
See also: Republicans Are Already Sowing Doubt About Election Results, Naturally. Parker Molloy's The Present Age. November 2, 2026 (one day before the midterm elections).
I am crowdfunding
HISTORICAL POETRY BOOK: "Attis & Aleph" on BackerKit. Taking pledges through Nov 19!
Books to read
"𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘉𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩: 𝘈𝘯 𝘌𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘤 & 𝘗𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘖𝘪𝘭 by John Michael Greer (+ @scarlet.imprint) is a challenging and radical book. It fuses deep ecology and hard physical science with an adept’s understanding of magic." — Blackened Hand Books
Sunday, November 1, 2026
Wednesday, October 28, 2026
Traditional publishers are using AI
Big Five publishers are quietly using AI—and some employees are horrified For Wired, I spoke with workers about the quiet push to experiment with AI tools from book publishing executives at the Big Five. Adam Morgan, The Front List, October 9, 2026
Workers at three major publishing houses tell WIRED that LLMs are being used for publicity, cover art, back cover copy, and emails, as some execs push junior staff to champion the tech.
— WIRED (@wired.com) October 17, 2026 at 9:15 AM
[image or embed]
Authors are going to “war” with Big Five publishers over AI: For Wired, I spoke with bestselling authors who are demanding AI disclosures from the Big Five and threatening to leave traditional publishing altogether. Adam Morgan, The Front List, October 28, 2026
See this kind of thing is the reason I’m not even TRYING to work with traditional publishing. I walked away from a stable, lucrative career specifically to get away from the stink of this bullshit. www.wired.com/story/macmil...
— gradientdescent (@gradientdescent.net) October 28, 2026 at 8:58 AM
[image or embed]
Catapult is closing, and it is taking three small presses down with it:
Public service announcement: You know who isn't using AI? The authors on the Book Bazaar 2026, a crowdfunding event on BackerKit, Oct 29–Nov 19. For example, the poetry biography Attis & Aleph: Poems of the Daimonic.
Friday, October 23, 2026
Tech companies are pushing AI to squeeze it before it squeezes them
Eamon Caddigan writes:
"The largest tech companies—which already comprise an uncomfortably large portion of the economy (in spite of the fact that they produce none of the necessities of life)—have bet their fortunes on AI. Actual innovation in neural networks themselves has slowed as the companies and investors focus on building larger models, requiring tremendous amounts of training data and energy to create.
It’s worth highlighting that explicit climate denialism is well out of vogue here in 2026. Most people profess belief in the scientific consensus that society’s dependence on fossil fuels is warming the climate. This stops few of them from using a technology that is directly increasing society’s thirst for oil. When people like me argue that this technology is unfit for adoption on the basis of its energy requirements alone, AI users will simply ignore anything that we have to say.
This is the template for a common pattern. We can point out all of the harms being done by the technology right now, and we can speak to the additional harms that will be done if things continue like this, but our concerns are spurned or ignored. AI users seem untroubled by—or unaware of—the dissonance, because the richest individuals and corporations have decided that the future must be built on this specific approach to this specific technology that they own.
* * *
Eschewing AI is one thing that we can actually do to live out ethics that affirm values of human and environmental rights. It’s almost a gift! Just use a computer the same way you did three years ago!
... My emotional state in this moment recalls that from late 2002, during the lead-up to the US invasion of Iraq. It seemed obvious then that the people leading the nation were lying to justify war, and that nothing good would come of it (for anyone but a small handful of rich people anyway), yet the media and much of the population treated critics with absolute contempt. Being anti-AI feels the same as being anti-war. The salient differences between then and now are that the bloodshed will be harder to attribute (how many people are killed by one tenth of one degree of global warming, and what proportion of that temperature rise comes from one specific gas-burning data center?), and that more of my actual peers—including dear friends—are on the wrong side of this. The familiarity stings, but the pattern is repeating itself because nothing has fundamentally changed about us since then."
— Eamon Caddigan, "Hating AI in 2026," Potentially Useful: Writing boring posts is okay, May 27, 2026
Cory Doctorow writes in October 2026: "With its AI projects — AI summaries, the Gemini chatbot — Google has abandoned the practice of 'connecting works with audiences.' Today, Google’s function is to plunder all the works on the internet and chop them up and arrange them in an unimaginably vast, multidimensional array for the explicit purpose of preventing audiences from connecting with those works."
Amelia Rose Barlow, who is co-stewarding We the Interdependent and Declaring Our Tech Futures, a campaign inviting Americans to shape our technological future together, writes:
"...adulthood demands more than independence. It asks not only what we want to be free from, but what we are responsible for. Whom our choices affect. What we are prepared to protect. And the future we want to create by declaring it together.
My father knew his declaration was imperfect: a lone man invoking the Founding Fathers, planting a flag in the dark. It is time for a second draft, one that empowers every voice as part of a collective and recognizes our inherent relationship and responsibility to one another and the living world that sustains us."
— Amelia Rose Barlow, "My Father Gave the Internet Its Declaration of Independence. It’s Time for a Second Draft." In 1996, Grateful Dead lyricist John Perry Barlow wrote “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” The age of AI demands we reimagine it. Rolling Stone, Oct 22, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
In case you missed it
Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?
The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...
-
[Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adwa. In one part of the detail, an army aims a cannon at opposing forces as they are about to decapi... -
Medium has a cool feature to nip disruptive comments in the bud. You can "hide" the response, which is an alternative to outright ... -
The Eunuch and the Virgin engulfs the reader in a cloud of heron and emu feathers and provides distraction from everyday life with tales...