"ππ©π¦ πππ°π°π₯ π°π§ π΅π©π¦ ππ’π³π΅π©: ππ― ππ΄π΄π’πΊ π°π― ππ’π¨πͺπ€ & ππ¦π’π¬ ππͺπ by John Michael Greer (+ @scarlet.imprint) is a challenging and radical book. It fuses deep ecology and hard physical science with an adept’s understanding of magic." — Blackened Hand Books
Disruptive Dissertation
Wide-ranging topics about the human condition today.
Monday, November 2, 2026
Sunday, November 1, 2026
Wednesday, October 28, 2026
Traditional publishers are using AI
Big Five publishers are quietly using AI—and some employees are horrified For Wired, I spoke with workers about the quiet push to experiment with AI tools from book publishing executives at the Big Five. Adam Morgan, The Front List, October 9, 2026
(Psst — that image might look like Gen AI but isn't. Salle des Fetes, Paris, France. Photo taken at the Paris Exposition of 1900. The Goodyear Archival Collection, Brooklyn Museum Archives. Via Wikimedia Commons.)Workers at three major publishing houses tell WIRED that LLMs are being used for publicity, cover art, back cover copy, and emails, as some execs push junior staff to champion the tech.
— WIRED (@wired.com) October 17, 2026 at 9:15 AM
[image or embed]
Authors are going to “war” with Big Five publishers over AI: For Wired, I spoke with bestselling authors who are demanding AI disclosures from the Big Five and threatening to leave traditional publishing altogether. Adam Morgan, The Front List, October 28, 2026
See this kind of thing is the reason I’m not even TRYING to work with traditional publishing. I walked away from a stable, lucrative career specifically to get away from the stink of this bullshit. www.wired.com/story/macmil...
— gradientdescent (@gradientdescent.net) October 28, 2026 at 8:58 AM
[image or embed]
Catapult is closing, and it is taking three small presses down with it:
Public service announcement: You know who isn't using AI? The authors on the Book Bazaar 2026, a crowdfunding event on BackerKit, Oct 29–Nov 19. For example, the poetry biography Attis & Aleph: Poems of the Daimonic.
Friday, October 23, 2026
Tech companies are pushing AI to squeeze it before it squeezes them
Eamon Caddigan writes:
"The largest tech companies—which already comprise an uncomfortably large portion of the economy (in spite of the fact that they produce none of the necessities of life)—have bet their fortunes on AI. Actual innovation in neural networks themselves has slowed as the companies and investors focus on building larger models, requiring tremendous amounts of training data and energy to create.
It’s worth highlighting that explicit climate denialism is well out of vogue here in 2026. Most people profess belief in the scientific consensus that society’s dependence on fossil fuels is warming the climate. This stops few of them from using a technology that is directly increasing society’s thirst for oil. When people like me argue that this technology is unfit for adoption on the basis of its energy requirements alone, AI users will simply ignore anything that we have to say.
This is the template for a common pattern. We can point out all of the harms being done by the technology right now, and we can speak to the additional harms that will be done if things continue like this, but our concerns are spurned or ignored. AI users seem untroubled by—or unaware of—the dissonance, because the richest individuals and corporations have decided that the future must be built on this specific approach to this specific technology that they own.
* * *
Eschewing AI is one thing that we can actually do to live out ethics that affirm values of human and environmental rights. It’s almost a gift! Just use a computer the same way you did three years ago!
... My emotional state in this moment recalls that from late 2002, during the lead-up to the US invasion of Iraq. It seemed obvious then that the people leading the nation were lying to justify war, and that nothing good would come of it (for anyone but a small handful of rich people anyway), yet the media and much of the population treated critics with absolute contempt. Being anti-AI feels the same as being anti-war. The salient differences between then and now are that the bloodshed will be harder to attribute (how many people are killed by one tenth of one degree of global warming, and what proportion of that temperature rise comes from one specific gas-burning data center?), and that more of my actual peers—including dear friends—are on the wrong side of this. The familiarity stings, but the pattern is repeating itself because nothing has fundamentally changed about us since then."
— Eamon Caddigan, "Hating AI in 2026," Potentially Useful: Writing boring posts is okay, May 27, 2026
Cory Doctorow writes in October 2026: "With its AI projects — AI summaries, the Gemini chatbot — Google has abandoned the practice of 'connecting works with audiences.' Today, Google’s function is to plunder all the works on the internet and chop them up and arrange them in an unimaginably vast, multidimensional array for the explicit purpose of preventing audiences from connecting with those works."
Amelia Rose Barlow, who is co-stewarding We the Interdependent and Declaring Our Tech Futures, a campaign inviting Americans to shape our technological future together, writes:
"...adulthood demands more than independence. It asks not only what we want to be free from, but what we are responsible for. Whom our choices affect. What we are prepared to protect. And the future we want to create by declaring it together.
My father knew his declaration was imperfect: a lone man invoking the Founding Fathers, planting a flag in the dark. It is time for a second draft, one that empowers every voice as part of a collective and recognizes our inherent relationship and responsibility to one another and the living world that sustains us."
— Amelia Rose Barlow, "My Father Gave the Internet Its Declaration of Independence. It’s Time for a Second Draft." In 1996, Grateful Dead lyricist John Perry Barlow wrote “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” The age of AI demands we reimagine it. Rolling Stone, Oct 22, 2026
Thursday, October 22, 2026
2026: Voting rights in the US (a collection of reading material)
Some sources I've collected.
The U.S. Lacks What Every Democracy Needs, Richard Hasen, New York Times, Jan. 16, 2024
I wrote: Can Trans People Still Vote in the US?: Trump’s March 25, 2025 executive order will require U.S. voters to show ID that displays our citizenship and gender
‘Batshit Authoritarianism’: Trump Allies Drafting Order to Give Him ‘Extraordinary Power Over Voting’: “This is a plot to interfere with the will of voters and undermine both the rule of law and public confidence in our elections,” said Sen. Mark Warner. Brad Reed, Common Dreams, Feb 26, 2026
Sarah Kendzior wrote in her memoir, The Last American Road Trip (2025):
"You mourn the lost leverage of the ordinary American — of elections, of courts, of protest, of documentation. You remember when those things seemed to matter, or at least when the powerful felt obligated to pretend they did."
It’s Black disenfranchisement, not ‘partisan warfare’ Dan Froomkin, Press Watch, May 15, 2026
The Supreme Court Has Unleashed 'Jim Crow 2.0' As The South Rolls Back Black Representation The decision gutting the Voting Rights Act has commenced the largest rollback of Black representation in the South since the end of Reconstruction. Paul Blumenthal, HuffPost, May 16, 2026
Trump Administration Promotes Program To Check Voter Eligibility. Critics Fear A Midterm Purge: The Trump administration has run the names of at least 67 million voters through government databases as it looks for noncitizens and people who've died. John Hanna, May 17, 2026
We’re going back to Selma and Montgomery. Why? The Supreme Court destroyed the Voting Rights Act, and the country needs to be reminded who we were before Civil Rights - and why we can’t go back.
— Congressman Greg Landsman (@repgreglandsman.bsky.social) May 15, 2026 at 4:03 PM
[image or embed]
The End of the Voting Rights Act Isn’t Just a “Black Problem” Preserving racial hierarchy remains one of most animating impulses in American political life. Alain Stephens, The Intercept, May 20 2026
Khanna: "This is a Dred Scott court. They have engaged in the fastest rollback of Black political rights since Rutherford Hayes ended Reconstruction in 1877. One-third of African American seats are threatened. We are not speaking up strongly enough against a court that's rolling back civil rights"
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) May 24, 2026 at 9:50 AM
[image or embed]
"This era demands a new framework for Black politics—fresh strategies, tactics, leaders, and goals. And we should be clear-eyed: even before Callais, the existing models of Black politics were growing stale." newrepublic.com/article/2106...
— Perry Bacon (@perrybaconjr.bsky.social) May 25, 2026 at 8:41 AM
[image or embed]
Trump Official Tried To Ban Half Of U.S. Voting Machines, Citing Conspiracy Theories: The president's election-security czar asked whether the Commerce Department could declare the components in the machines as national-security risks. Erin Banco, Jonathan Landay and Alexandra Alper, Reuters, HuffPost, May 22, 2026
The same people saying the Supreme Court didn’t really gut the Voting Rights Act would have looked at poll taxes and literacy tests and said, “What’s the problem? Everyone still has the right to vote.”
— This Is NOT Business As Usual (@jemartisby.bsky.social) May 25, 2026 at 6:58 PM
Gift link. Great piece, remarkable embedded footage: www.nytimes.com/2026/04/29/u...
— Rachel Maddow (@maddow.bsky.social) April 29, 2026 at 4:18 PM
[image or embed]
I am unspeakably angry about this turnout gap figure, and it gives insight into the whole ballgame for gutting the VRA. Alito points out that Black turnout exceeded White turnout twice in 5 elections. The argument is garbage 1/x
— Kevin Morris (@kevintmorris.bsky.social) April 29, 2026 at 5:41 PM
[image or embed]
The Trump Justice Department is doubling down on an argument that, if accepted, could open the door for the administration — and anti-voting groups — to create lists of voters and send them to states for removal right before elections. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
— Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) June 10, 2026 at 3:38 PM
[image or embed]
The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Will Reach Far Beyond Congress: Thousands of seats held by Black, Latino and Native officeholders at the local level could be threatened by the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais. Paul Blumenthal, HuffPost, Jul 26, 2026
"President Donald Trump on Monday pleaded with Republican lawmakers to pass his SAVE America Act and end the filibuster, telling them to forgo their summer vacation to get it done...Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.)...has repeatedly said there aren’t the votes in the Senate to pass the bill. The president has long proposed blowing up the filibuster, a rule that requires most bills to secure 60 votes to advance in the Senate." Trump Makes Desperate Plea To Ram Through Voter ID Plan, Graeme Demianyk, July 27, 2026
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued guidance last month that “appears to be an attempt to intimidate nursing home staff from assisting residents in the voting process," a group of senators wrote this week.
— Mother Jones (@motherjones.com) August 13, 2026 at 10:15 PM
[image or embed]
The Trump administration is sending at least 1,000 "election monitors" to oversee voting in multiple precincts across the country.
— Headquarters (@headquartersnews.bsky.social) August 20, 2026 at 2:00 PM
[image or embed]
i'm not over Alito saying we shouldn't count ballots that are mailed on or before Election Day but arrive shortly afterwards bc they can “radically flip” the “apparent outcome” cannot stress enough that, until all ballots are counted, there's no outcome to flip! ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/alito...
— Barred and Boujee aka Madiba Dennie (@audrelawdamercy.blacksky.app) September 18, 2026 at 8:45 AM
[image or embed]
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wrongly identified 185 people on Nevada’s voter rolls as non-citizens, state officials said this week, escalating concerns over the shoddy methodology the government is using to raise fear about non-citizen voting ahead of th... TAT: [Undermining democracy]
— Trump Action Tracker (@trumpactiontracker.bsky.social) September 25, 2026 at 10:38 AM
[image or embed]
Thanks to SCOTUS GOP-appointed majority (same ones who attended Trump's state dinner last night), Trump admin will use faulty & inaccurate data to wrongly label eligible voters non-citizens & pressure states to remove them from rolls. Sets a chilling precedent www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
— Ari Berman (@ariberman.bsky.social) September 25, 2026 at 12:06 PM
[image or embed]
Sanjana Karanth perfectly explains how Trump Gives Nonsense Answer When Pressed About His Mail-In Voting Hypocrisy, HuffPost, Oct 5, 2026. Trump says that his supporters can...
"...“vote by mail or vote in person. I’d rather have them vote in person, but they can vote by mail if they want. Because we seem to have no choice, because a lot of people wanna vote by mail but a lot of very good people wanna vote in person. You can do either,” he rambled at a press gaggle.
“What we’re concerned about is … there is a lot of cheating in vote by mail. A lot of cheating all over,” he continued, citing a narrative he’s pushed for years. When a reporter pointed out the fact that there is no evidence of widespread fraud in mail-in voting, the president accused them of being fake news.
Despite his fearmongering around the method, Trump himself votes by mail."
On October 22, 2026, Advocates for Trans Equality (A4TE) sent an email with this:
"Right now, trans voters in 14 states face nearly impossible barriers to updating their gender marker on their IDs. In some places, photo IDs are required to vote.
* * *
In April 2026, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais which severely limits the use of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. This section allowed —and sometimes required—the creation of majority-minority districts, enabling more Black and Latino leaders to represent their communities in Congress.
Weeks later, the Kansas government invalidated the driver’s licenses of almost two thousand trans people who had previously updated their gender marker.
Trans people can still vote with a gender marker that is inaccurate, but this can make it much harder for trans people to safely cast their ballots.
This is all a familiar playbook. Extremists are using old tactics in an obvious attempt to control our elections and discourage people from voting."
Thank you.
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
In case you missed it
Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?
The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...
-
[Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adwa. In one part of the detail, an army aims a cannon at opposing forces as they are about to decapi...
-
Medium has a cool feature to nip disruptive comments in the bud. You can "hide" the response, which is an alternative to outright ...
-
The Eunuch and the Virgin engulfs the reader in a cloud of heron and emu feathers and provides distraction from everyday life with tales...



