Friday, June 12, 2026

2026: US admitting only white South Africans as refugees

The US has not admitted any refugees — not really, not exactly — in 2026. Everyone who had this immigration designation has been a white South African. Except for three people who were something other than a white South African.

Andrea Pitzer explains this.

[Andrea Pitzer speaking:] "As Mother Jones has reported, with more than 6,000 refugees admitted to this country since October 1 of last year" [i.e., since October 1, 2025] — [clip of Donald Trump speaking:] "but whether they're white or black makes no difference to me" — [Pitzer again:] "only three asylum seekers who were admitted was anything but somebody white from South Africa." [Clip of Nermeen Shaikh speaking on May 21, 2026:] "The Trump administration is advancing plans to increase the number of white South Africans it admits to the United States as refugees in the coming months. The proposal would see an additional 10,000 white South Africans resettled into the US even as the Trump administration continues to block the entry of refugees from other countries." (0:40-1:15)

"In June 2018, Sullivan posted on Twitter, 'Slowing massive demographic change is not fascist, it's conservative.' He was arguing against undocumented people in America. But did this slight of hand to talk about slowing demographic change? Is he against people coming without papers, or is he against people from predominantly non-white countries showing up? I've thought about this line of reasoning a lot since he made that comment years ago because 'slowing massive demographic change' is eugenics." (13:05–13:48)

"The long-standing ideal of the country as a home for poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free is erased." (15:16-24)

"The trap," says Pitzer, "is the idea that someone else's race or culture is the actual reason you feel lost." (17:03–10)

"Fascism has never — not once in human history — been driven by demographic change, a majority becoming a minority. Germans were under no demographic threat in the 1930s. Poles and Austrians are under no demographic threat. Nor are Italians. Whatever refugees and immigrants have arrived on these shores, they’re hardly to about to establish states where sipping coffee and wine, among other staples of European cultural life, are suddenly outlawed. And yet, neofascist politics are rising in all these places, aren’t they?"

— umair haque, Why it’s a Myth That Fascism’s About Demographic Change and Cultural Anxiety: How Neoliberals Have Taught You to Play Right Into Fascists’ Hands — Without Knowing It, Medium, Aug 17, 2018

"For the first time in a generation, the idea of freedom is not an especially important animating principle for the right. They use the word still, but they are fundamentally about something else now, fundamentally about protecting people from supposedly menacing forces like demographic change and changes to M&Ms and children’s books and 'woke' corporations. This is the pitch not of freedom but of the strongman."
Anand Giridharadas, Kamala Harris on Freedom: It's not just a Beyoncé song — it's about reclaiming an American ideal, The Ink, Jul 25, 2024

Here's a mention of "demographic change" I found. (emphases mine)

"The premise of the Mindful Resistance Project is that understanding and addressing the root causes of Trumpism is important—so important that we shouldn’t let Trump’s antics and outrages get in the way of this mission. To put a finer point on it: 1) We need to respond to each day’s news about Trump wisely—with moral clarity and forceful conviction but with awareness of the way overreactions to his provocations can play into his hands. 2) Meanwhile, we need to get a deeper understanding of the forces that led so many people to vote for Trump. These forces include globalization, demographic change, the loss of jobs through automation, and a political polarization that is grounded partly in the tribalizing tendencies of social media. This polarization is also grounded in what you might call the psychology of tribalism, in cognitive biases that afflict us all—so fostering an understanding of how our minds work will be among the goals of this project."
Robert Wright, How to Fight Trump Mindfully: Plus: Non-Trump news. Trump goes hawk? A setback for EVs? (Working) class-less Dems. And more! NonZero Newsletter, Nov 8, 2024

$1.776 billion slush fund to enrich January 6 rioters would be a billion-dollar theft

‘He’s Just Stealing Your Money’: House Dems Launch Bid to Block $1.8 Billion Trump-MAGA ‘Slush Fund’: “It’s illegal and corrupt as hell,” Congressman Don Beyer said of the president’s self-dealing $1.77 billion IRS settlement. “We’re fighting it in court.” Brett Wilkins, May 18, 2026

Capitol rioter photographed in the act of gleefully trashing someone's office

Todd Blanche Suggests Jan. 6 Rioters Eligible For ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Payments: The Justice Department has not spelled out what "weaponization" means, but it apparently could include having been prosecuted for assaulting law enforcement. Arthur Delaney, HuffPost, May 19, 2026

Democrats Force First Vote On Trump’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ Democrats will try to make sure Republicans pay a political price if they support the president's new payout scheme. Arthur Delaney, HuffPost, May 19, 2026

A Criminal Conspiracy that Changes Everything.: The most brazen abuse of taxpayer money in American history just took place. Spread the word. Amber Tamblyn, May 19, 2026

Mike Johnson Pretends To Have No Idea ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ Could Benefit Jan. 6 Rioters Meanwhile, a convicted Jan. 6 rioter told Huffpost he and others like him expected to be taken care of. Arthur Delaney, HuffPost, May 20, 2026

"It’s not unusual that a judge blocked the creation of President Trump’s “settlement” with himself, creating a $1.776 billion fund to reward people Trump seems to have been targeted by the government.
What’s unusual is that the administration calmly said it would comply.
* * *
What changed?
This time, the administration faced skepticism from the courts and Congress."
“Checks and balances” is plural for a reason Congress and courts, together, prompted a different response from the Trump administration. Steve Inskeep, Differ We Must, Jun 02, 2026

BREAKING: Judge Brinkema is giving the Trump admin one week to submit a sworn statement — signed by the Attorney General and Treasury Secretary — that the slush fund will not go forward.

[image or embed]

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1.bsky.social) June 12, 2026 at 10:00 AM

Hey, I previously wrote: Who Paid $3 Million for the January 6 Riot & Election Overthrow Attempts: A reminder: The coup was planned, and many people organized it (Oct 19, 2024)

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

On billionaires

"But I've spent decades in this industry, often knowing the executives and investors long before they came to wield so much power, and... they're just a bunch of dudes. They're just as prone to becoming swept up in stupid conspiracized thinking as, well, everyone else in their demographic seems to have been. And it's important to remember, nobody becomes a billionaire by accident. You have to have wanted that level of power, control and wealth more than you wanted anything else in your life. They all sacrifice family, relationships, stability, community, connection, and belonging in service of keeping score on a scale that actually yields no additional real-world benefits on the path from that first $100 million to the tens of billions.

So you have a cohort that is, counterintutively, very easily manipulated. If you have access to a billionaire (and billionaires all have access to each other, because it suits their ego to think of each other as peers), most are very easy to program by simply playing to their insecurity and desire for acknowledgement of exceptionalism, and so they push each other further and further into extreme ideas because their entire careers have been predicated on the idea that they're genius outliers who can see things others can't, and that their wealth is a reward for that imagined merit. "I must be smart, look how rich I am." The rising power of movements meant to counter their influence has catalyzed a vicious, and frankly very weird, backlash where they want to put everyone else in their place. And, due to the insularity of their lifestyles, they very seldom have any corrective voices pointing out when they've clearly lost the plot. If it weren't for the deep harm they were doing to so many with these radical ideas, I'd have a lot of pity and empathy for the fact that they're clearly acting out due to social isolation and the existential emptiness that must come from pursuing wealth and power to such an extreme degree that there's no room left in life for someone to call them on their bullshit."

— Anil Dash, "VC qanon" and the radicalization of the tech tycoons, 07 Jul 2023

"The rise of extreme wealth is one of the clearest signs of this imbalance. In 1987, billionaires held wealth equal to 3% of global GDP. Today this tiny elite, just 0.0001% of the world population, owns the equivalent of *16%* of world GDP in wealth."

[image or embed]

— Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò (@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social) April 15, 2026 at 10:21 AM

"After 2018, in part because of Trump’s tax cuts for the rich that went into effect at the start of that year, America’s richest 0.1 percent are now worth more than the entire GDP of China.

What do they do with all this money? Well, when they’re not just shooting rockets into space or building hideous trucks, they’re spending it on politics.

Billionaire political spending in presidential elections is exploding.

After the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, it took off.

In the last presidential election, just 300 billionaire families spent roughly $3 billion. Those families gave an average of $10 million each — roughly 100,000 times what an average donor gave.

And the super-rich are getting a big return on their “investment.” They’re getting more tax cuts, more deregulation, and a government that lets them get away with busting unions, exploiting workers, and monopolizing their markets while poisoning the environment."

— Robert Reich, Inequality Isn't Just Unfair. It's Dangerous! Jun 09, 2026

Hear Danielle Moodie explain that billionaires are a virus (Danielle Moodie, talking to Jared Yates Sexton, We're Reaching the Moment of Truth: The Check-In with Jared Yates Sexton and Danielle Moodie, April 15, 2026, see 31:00 and later)

palace with palm tree

‘This Is Oligarchy’: Nearly 100 Billionaires Are Funding Susan Collins’ Reelection Bid: “While Susan Collins’ campaign is backed by billionaire donors, our campaign is built on a movement funded by the people, with an average donation of $26,” said Graham Platner’s campaign manager. Jake Johnson, Common Dreams, Jun 12, 2026

Not that kind of 'alien'

In case you missed it

Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?

The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...