Wednesday, June 3, 2026

The fascist enablers are selling 'veneers'

Do you listen to Dispatches From a Collapsing State? It's a weekly conversation, one hour, paywalled. If you think it's wonderful, support these creators. Dispatches is on Substack, and I realize many people have reason to avoid Substack — Danielle Moodie also has a show on YouTube, and Jared Yates Sexton has a Patreon, so support them where you can.

Today, on Dispatches, Danielle says something that will stick in my brain for a while:

"When people say: 'Oh, they couldn't possibly bring back segregation, they can't possibly bring back slavery,' I'm like: 'We used to have this thing called Roe v. Wade. We used to have this thing called the Voting Rights Act. Get out! Like, I need people to actually imagine with their whole brain about what the setup is here. It isn't just about the grift. It is also about getting rid of the entire Constitution of these United States that they are slowly dismantling through the Supreme Court. Right? So, when people say, 'Oh, it couldn't happen,' like, progress is not just forward fucking movement because you will always have at least half of this country that is invested in misunderstanding, that is invested in racism and misogyny, that is invested in capitalism to any extent. They don't care about humanity. So I need people to stop thinking that, like a midterms [elections] is going to save you, that the next presidential election is going to save you, bcause what is at the core of America isn't fundamentally good, it is fucking rotten to its core. And all that we have put up — It's like going to the dentist and you have cavities and they're like, 'We'll just put on veneers. We're not gonna actually — ' and then you're like, 'But shouldn't you remove the rotten teeth?' 'No, no, we'll just give you medication for it.' So you live numb but you look good but you're rotting from the inside fucking out. That's America." (48:00-49:45)

Jared's thing in this episode is that anyone who is still selling veneers has chosen to lie to themselves and to others. He can't tolerate the deception anymore. He can't spend his time trying to persuade them. They need to get real. The fascists are telling us exactly what they're doing, why they're doing it, and what their intended outcome is, so it's not hard to understand. Even if it were hard, many people have studied history, reported news, interpreted what's going on, and we can listen to them and believe them.

twister

'Sympathetic pitilessness'

Talking about Molly Crabapple's Here Where We Live Is Our Country, Cory Doctorow describes her "admirable achievement of being both sympathetic and pitiless." As "a veteran political activist," Crabapple has "endured every failure that radical politics can manifest, sat through every kind of bad meeting, and she recognizes in these disputes the same personalities and personal failings that have broken her heart a hundred times. She understands why these people are this way — but she can also see, with perfect hindsight, the ghastly horrors that followed..."

I understand this feeling. You can understand someone well enough that you wince at what they are going through, including the mistakes they themselves are making. And yet you don't have to coddle them. You can judge that, on an ethical level, they've chosen poorly.

Each of us is obliged to tell the truth about the callous people in power who wreak extreme harm as well as the revolutionaries who are flawed and who fail or are failed. There are appropriate ways to tell those truths. Sometimes doing so involves a measure of sympathy, since sympathy, too, is part of our truth.

Truth-telling is the opposite of putting up a veneer.

Monday, June 1, 2026

Trump says there is no joy except in kissing his ass

You've heard people say: What if someone believes they're trans but later discovers they aren't and they regret their transition? They dress this up as a "reasonable concern." But the "reasonableness" is only the tone or phrasing of the question; there's never any good reason behind it. The more you repeat it — what if you regret it? what if you regret it? — the more it sounds like a threat.

old video of Donald Trump in a wrestling ring beating someone up. In 2017, someone superimposed 'CNN' on the victim's head, suggesting that Trump was beating up journalists, and Trump shared it.

I have written:

Anti-trans people don't have evidence that lots of trans people regret our choices, nor that regret is a problem to be solved (either in oneself or in someone else), nor that the proper solution would be for authorities to take away everyone's body autonomy so that no one can live a trans life.

If trans people are sad about anything, it's transphobia. Trans people overall are very happy with our transitions.

The anti-trans people therefore resort to asserting that all trans people are sad.

And (for those who are right-wing in other respects) that everyone to the left of them is sad.

And — as Donald Trump now has it — that anyone who doesn't kiss his ass is sad.

In the wee hours of this morning, Donald Trump posted to his own social media site:

Donald J. Trump on Truth Social, in the early hours of Jun 1, 2026: Has anyone ever seen a happy Dumocrat??? President DJT

(Yes, that's real.)

Speaking of happiness, this is a man who didn't like social media, a man who, discontent with the PR opportunities available to him as a U.S. president and as a billionaire days shy of his 80th birthday who's been world-famous his whole life, had to create his own tech platform to put out his press releases and claim that it is "social media." It isn't social at all. It's really sad. He is a sad person, and that's an understated way of describing the void within him.

I believe this is a big part of what anti-trans people mean when they say What if trans people regret their transitions? They are likely basing their knowledge in their own experience of being huma, and what they very likely mean is a reflection of their own feelings: I feel sad about my life, I have made some choices I'd like to reevaluate and wish I could redo, and I don't know where to go from here.

Sunday, May 31, 2026

U.S.: Essentially, no federal funding for science

Scientists aren't allowed to do things that are key to science:

tl,dr; Scientists no longer allowed to use federal funding to publish, attend meetings, or talk to the public. They cannot collaborate internationally. Grants can be cancelled for any reason, at any time, political appointees have a final say over what gets funded, and who gets funded.

[image or embed]

— Alex Wild (@alexwild.bsky.social) May 29, 2026 at 6:04 PM

the supposedly "originalist" unitary executive theory has led us to a point where the president is claiming the sovereign authority to force all institutions, public or private, to bend to his will or suffer the consequences www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/u...

[image or embed]

— jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) June 2, 2026 at 10:41 AM

This is why, last year, I wrote Cthulhu Is My Alma Mater: The president thinks we’re undead (7 min read), Aug 4, 2025. The Trump regime said to Brown University, essentially, give up certain kinds of diversity we don't like, and we'll let you continue to have federal funding. The university administration, claiming it had no choice, said OK. Yet the Trump regime continues to yank federal funding from everything, everyone, everywhere.

At the time, Brown said: Since, as we've promised the Trump regime, our university health services will no longer provide gender-affirming care to anyone under 18, we'll just refer 17-year-olds to providers at nearby hospitals.

Welp, any kid who went to RI Hospital just had their name given to a judge who is essentially working for the Trump regime:

DOJ Files In Texas To Force RI Hospital To Hand Over Trans Patient Lists In Judge Shopping Move 1,800 Miles Away: The only basis for the lawsuit being filed in Texas is "the investigation is held there." Erin Reed, May 1, 2026

Brown University could have chosen to protect those kids' names. Instead, Brown referred them out to a hospital that then turned over their names to a Texas judge, simply because they are trans kids and the Project 2025 folks want to know who they are.

The Trump regime's goal was always to defund science and make lists of trans people.

rainbow threat alert chart from the early days of the U.S. Dept of Homeland Security

NEW: A likely hate crime in Chicago left a prominent trans science educator, @jeymccreight.bsky.social with severe injuries after a brutal late night beating. McCreight told @evanurquhart.bsky.social he's shaken but determined to continue his activism. CPD confirmed an ongoing investigation.

[image or embed]

— Assigned Media (@assignedmedia.org) May 26, 2026 at 7:56 AM

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Trump's absurd climate speech

On September 23, 2025, Trump gave an absurd speech, supposedly on climate, to the United Nations.

Here are some miscellaneous reports on that and also on Trump's war on science more generally.

Check out: Trump delivers dumbest climate speech of all time: The president's easily-debunked 10-minute climate tirade at the U.N. was so stupid and unoriginal, it was actually kind of funny. Emily Atkin, HEATED, Sep 24, 2025

tree

Harrison Ford says Trump’s assault on climate policy ‘scares the shit out of me’ Indiana Jones star calls US president one of history’s greatest criminals for attacks on science and boosting of fossil fuels, Oliver Milman, The Guardian, 31 Oct 2025

And just to be complete, in case you need verified NOAA data, yes, as of October, 2025, it's official, a new record was set for the 36-month mean rate of atmospheric CO2 growth: Feb., 2019: 7.826 ppm per 36 months. Oct., 2025: 7.874 ppm per 36 months. Winning!

[image or embed]

— Prof. Eliot Jacobson (@climatecasino.net) November 13, 2025 at 8:20 PM

Your daily reminder that the fossil fuel industry is propped up by billions of dollars in U.S. government subsidies and a multimillion dollar campaign to spread climate disinformation. 💵

— Center for Climate Integrity (@climateintegrity.org) November 17, 2025 at 11:52 AM

Sabine the doomer? "And I guess that’s the thing that’s so frustrating about this. That it’s all so obvious. We were obviously never going to do anything about this until it’s way too late." www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5Gh...

[image or embed]

— Prof. Eliot Jacobson (@climatecasino.net) November 18, 2025 at 2:03 PM

We found so many examples of missing federal government data that we couldn’t put them all in this story. “The status quo was, the federal government is going to collect and disseminate data. That is no longer a reasonable assumption.”

[image or embed]

— Anna Kramer (@annackramer.bsky.social) February 2, 2026 at 8:52 AM

US Youth, Climate Coalition Sue to Stop Trump EPA ‘From Torching Our Kids’ Future’ “This shameful and dangerous action,” said one expert, “is rooted in falsehoods, not facts, and is at complete odds with the public interest and the best available science.” Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams, Feb 18, 2026

"Kate Marvel spent more than a decade at NASA studying the future of life on Earth. Then the Trump administration made that job feel impossible.

“Instead of saying, we value your science and here’s how we’re going to protect it, we were being told things like, ‘Make sure you take your pronouns out of your email signature,’” she told HEATED. “That was the highest priority.”

Marvel, a prominent climate scientist, resigned from NASA in March amid the Trump administration’s sweeping attacks on federal science. Since Trump’s second term started, more than 10,000 federal employees with STEM Ph.D.s have left the government—mostly through layoffs, firings and buyouts—and more than 7,800 research grants were terminated or frozen. It’s, in other words, a nerd purge."

Why Kate Marvel left NASA: The prominent climate scientist explains how pronouns have become more important than the planet at the nation's space agency. Emily Atkin, HEATED, May 28, 2026

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

U.S. national book bans: CHARLIE Act

🚨Bad news. A THIRD National book banning bill has passed committee in the house.🚨 Meet the CHARLIE act that will prohibit the teaching of what they call: equity ideology (not white supremacist jingoistic history) More from @authorsabb.bsky.social when we have it. www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...

[image or embed]

— Maggie Tokuda-Hall (@maggietokudahall.bsky.social) May 26, 2026 at 10:41 AM

Write to your representative in Washington

"As your constituent, I urge you to vote no on HR 8705, the 'CHARLIE Act.' The intent is to discriminate. The bill would derail discussions about the experiences of Black, Latino, Indigenous American, non-Christian, and LGBTQ+ students and communities.

Even were this bill in good faith, Trump shouldn't dictate educational standards. Those decisions can be made locally and personally by people who have studied to be educators, who are licensed and who have built careers in education. Students can learn critical thinking so they can reach their own conclusions and opinions. That's what school is for."

You may be interested

I wrote:

Can I Opt Out of Reading ‘Mahmoud v. Taylor’?: I wish I could, but I have to know what’s in it (10 min read) Jun 27, 2025

Good That We Had That Discourse About Politically Violent Speech: Last September, after Charlie Kirk was murdered (6 min read), Nov 20, 2025

US Capitol building

Thursday, May 21, 2026

UK: New EHRC guidance

very old photograph of a fainting woman

EHRC Guidance released: Our statement

[image or embed]

— What The Trans?! 🏳️‍⚧️ (@whatthetrans.com) May 21, 2026 at 10:24 AM

The Times coverage of what the Code is likely to contain is embarrassingly wrong. It talks repeatedly about what it will tell employers to do – but, of course, the guidance is only for service providers and associations. This is a question of basic accuracy and understanding. Shameful.

— Jess O'Thomson (@jessothomson.co.uk) May 21, 2026 at 2:58 AM

New EHRC guidance is due today. Remember: ➡️ Early reports based on unattributed briefings are spin, not facts. ➡️ This is civil law around who can and cannot bring discrimination claims - not criminal law. ➡️ Whatever it says, it is a choice by this government. They can fix it. ➡️ We will keep going.

— Trans+ Solidarity Alliance (@transsolidarity.bsky.social) May 21, 2026 at 2:44 AM

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Rhode Island Hospital gave trans kids' records to a Texas judge

TX Judge O'Connor is going to war with RI Judge McElroy over DOJ subpoenas for trans kids' medical records. She quashed the subpoenas. He orders the RI hospital to comply, and orders them not to seek relief in any venue but NDTX, Fifth Circuit, or SCOTUS. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

[image or embed]

— Liz Dye (@lizdye.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 3:21 PM

From the actual PDF, looks like the order is requiring RI to provide the documents to O'Connor to be held in camera for the pendency of the proceedings, not to turn it over to DOJ. That doesn't make it any less of a mess or any less improper, but I think that's still an important clarification.

[image or embed]

— Josh Block (@joshablock.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 4:15 PM

Background here www.lawandchaospod.com/p/doj-forum-...

[image or embed]

— Liz Dye (@lizdye.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 3:22 PM

And here abovethelaw.com/2026/05/doj-...

[image or embed]

— Liz Dye (@lizdye.bsky.social) May 18, 2026 at 3:22 PM

The US Dept of Justice and the 1st Circuit court told them to do it, and they did.

robot

See the thread on Bluesky if you want to read more of the court documents.

NEWS: Rhode Island Hospital notifies O'Connor it is will provide some documents to him "in camera" (meaning just to him, not DOJ) today, with follow-up productions going forward—but any patient info will be anonymized with identifying info removed and it will keep fighting the subpoena and his order

[image or embed]

— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) May 19, 2026 at 6:19 PM

Whatever was in the records, deidentified or otherwise, they were turned over.

And that's that. Judge Reed O' Connor now has in his possession the medical records of countless trans youth in Rhode Island that includes everything from private therapy notes detailing every aspect of their lives to their prescriptions and diagnoses.

[image or embed]

— Alejandra Caraballo (@esqueer.net) May 19, 2026 at 10:56 PM

The DOJ and the Texas judge were "openly colluding to abuse the system to hunt down trans kids," Alejandra Caraballo wrote. The 1st Circuit assumed that "preserving the veneer of collegiality is more important than acknowledging what is really happening here."

The reasoning in this decision is hopelessly naive. Reed O'Connor is now essentially the most powerful man in the country because the federal executive branch can now just go to him for a rubber stamped decision that carries the weight of the judicial branch.

[image or embed]

— Katelyn Burns (@katelynburns.com) May 20, 2026 at 5:57 AM

Read: This Federal Judge is More Powerful than the President: Reed O'Connor is the right's go-to judge when they want to bend the law to their culture war will, Katelyn Burns, Patreon, May 21, 2026

In case you missed it

Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?

The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...