Wednesday, November 27, 2024

How do you know that MAGA ranters are employed to endorse Trump?

decisions by two billionaires at the LA Times and Washington Post not to endorse Kamala Harris.

Here's more about the guy at the LA Times. Oliver Darcy wrote about this in Status.

Scoop: I spoke to Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong this evening about his apparent desire to stuff the newspaper's editorial board with dishonest pro-MAGA voices like Scott Jennings. Suffice to say, the convo didn't go super well. Details in Status: www.status.news/p/patrick-so...

[image or embed]

— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 11:04 PM

When I pointed out that Scott Jennings' job is to serve as a pro-Trump pundit, Soon-Shiong replied, "You just said is his job is to defend Donald Trump. Did you find that in his job description with CNN? I don't know if you know that as a fact." More in Status: www.status.news/p/patrick-so...

[image or embed]

— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 11:42 PM

A lot of political and media messaging in this country basically operates on mafia trial rules where unless you have someone on tape saying “I, [name], love to smuggle and distribute cocaine, which is derived from the coca plant” it’s plausible deniability.

[image or embed]

— Jake Cole (@jakecole.bsky.social) November 27, 2024 at 8:52 AM

It’s worth noting here that the end of this article confirms something Rogan has publicly lied about: Harris agreed to go on Rogan and he played patty-cake with schedulers to avoid it.

[image or embed]

— Josh Stein (@joshstein.bsky.social) November 27, 2024 at 5:11 PM

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

If you get on someone's bad side, they criticize you unsparingly

Americans are losing the right to exercise state power to restrict the fundamental human rights of a tiny minority of marginalized people without being criticized for that online, and Jeremy Fucking Peters is on it.

[image or embed]

— Julia Carrie Wong (@joolia.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 10:02 AM

That bio under the headline is horrible for the NYT to do. “He writes about this bigoted-ly a lot don’t worry he is an expert”

— Matty (@lionelkitchy.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 1:13 PM

It never makes the NYT for some reason but some things that anti-trans activists have done recently include: - bomb threats against children’s hospitals and clinics that offer gender affirming care - targeted campaigns to get trans and nb teachers fired - harassing gnc children at sports games

— Julia Carrie Wong (@joolia.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 10:41 AM

Anti-trans activist Elon Musk, whose politics Peters finds elusive, has declared his own daughter “dead” bc she’s trans. By comparison, the harsh trans activists are chastised by Peters for protesting (with strong language!) against: a US congressman, a billionaire author, and the White House.

— Julia Carrie Wong (@joolia.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 10:44 AM

love how uncontroversial this statement would be about literally any other group (imagine writing "to get on the wrong side of swifties is often to endure their unsparing criticism" in the newspaper) but here it's supposed to read as sinister

[image or embed]

— lauren (@lauren.rotatingsandwiches.com) November 26, 2024 at 1:05 PM

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Latest threat to free speech: Florida says book bans are government speech

This is scary. The Bill of Rights protects citizens from the government. Not the other way around. www.tcpalm.com/story/news/p...

[image or embed]

— EveryLibrary (@everylibrary.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM

Shield law for journalists

This is important. www.wired.com/story/press-...

[image or embed]

— Jeremy Kohler (@jeremykohler.bsky.social) November 18, 2024 at 9:23 PM

We CANNOT let this happen. A free and open press is essential!

[image or embed]

— Megaholt ð“…ƒ (@megaholt.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 8:00 PM

2025: The anti-trans laws we fear are coming

Here's what laws and policies I expect the incoming administration to pursue, based on Project 2025 and Agenda 47: * The FDA will ban the use of hormones for treating gender dysphoria * National ban on medical treatment of gender dysphoria in minors (affects RAND parents of trans youth) 1/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Ban on federal funding for any treatment of gender dysphoria with anything besides conversion talk therapy * National bathroom ban at all federal facilities, and probably facilities of federal contractors 2/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Law that states the federal government will only recognize gender markers if they match sex at birth (no more passport or driver’s license to use for air travel, or flee to Canada) * Potential revocation of security clearances for transgender individuals 3/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Loss of security clearances means almost no trans people left in federal employment or with federal contractors * Potential penalties on insurance plans that cover health care for trans people 4/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Bathroom ban on trans people at all schools, regardless of public or private * Day 1 executive order banning trans people from the military (everyone kicked out within 60 days). 5/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Laws making it far easier to sue doctors who provide health care for trans people * Any doctor or medical facility who receives federal dollars (Medicare, Medicaid, CHIPs) cannot continue to receive payment if they provide transition related health care (Hyde amendment, effectively) 6/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

* Almost needless to say, the VA will no longer be providing HRT to trans people. They will provide talk therapy to convince you you're not trans or to learn to live with untreated GD, and anti-depressants. If this doesn't seem survivable: it isn't. 7/n

— Brynn Tannehill (@brynntannehill.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 10:32 AM

Here we go again, the same old absolute flaming nonsense that looks to define sex in terms of “subjunctive gametes”…

[image or embed]

— Ethel Weapon (@lousadzak.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 3:09 PM

The language used is super familiar. So familiar that I already ripped it apart in this article. It’s like defining something in terms of “the thing that it would have if it did”. Vacuous. kim-hipwell.medium.com/why-gamete-p...

[image or embed]

— Ethel Weapon (@lousadzak.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 3:13 PM

This seems new though. Under this law, man and woman are non-fungible tokens.

[image or embed]

— Ethel Weapon (@lousadzak.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 3:15 PM

I don’t suppose the fact that all this is incoherent baloney makes any difference. It’s just a piece of paper to point when something is needed to say it’s OK to be vile to trans people.

— Ethel Weapon (@lousadzak.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 3:17 PM

After Trump’s victory, trans people across the country are grappling with questions about their legal protections and access to gender-affirming care and reproductive health, as well as concerns over their physical safety — in short, what survival will look like. The Trevor Project, an LGBTQ+ youth suicide prevention organization, saw a 700% increase in people reaching out the day after the election compared to the weeks prior.

During his campaign, Trump vowed to sign an executive order barring federal agencies from “the promotion of sex or gender transition at any age,” and has promised to restrict federal funding for hospitals or health care providers that perform gender-affirming care for minors. Republicans spent at least $215 million this campaign cycle on ads portraying trans people as a scourge to society, and the official party platform lists keeping “men out of women’s sports” as a priority.

And over the last two weeks, Trump has been busy stocking his administration with authors of Project 2025 — after claiming he knew “nothing” about the 920-page conservative playbook or who was behind it. Project 2025 outlines dozens of policies that essentially erase federal protections for LGBTQ+ people, including allowing Medicare and Medicaid to deny coverage for gender-affirming care; redefining sex as “biological sex,” a phrase that has been used by the right to discriminate against trans people and particularly trans women; and reinstating the transgender military ban.

— Lil Kalish, Trans People Are Scrambling To Prepare For The ‘Waking Nightmare’ Of Trump’s Second Term: Across the country, the trans community is grappling with questions about what survival looks like after Trump’s victory. HuffPost, Nov 22, 2024

Andrea Pitzer: The US as rogue state

"In 2015 I made two trips to Guantanamo while writing my history of concentration camps...

The first visit, I went to a pretrial hearing of the five 9/11 suspects...

One person I talked to not long after that was Mark Fallon, a career NCIS agent, who said something that stuck with me. As NCIS chief of counterintelligence operations for Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, he’d been part of the early interrogation program at Gitmo. He protested the U.S. turn to torture in interrogations there internally, later condemning it in public and writing a book, Unjustifiable Means.

Fallon told me that after 9/11, with the turn toward black sites and torture around the world, the U.S. had become a rogue state. And because we had brought those secret, illegal interrogation sites into being around the world, America had not only became a rogue state, but had pulled other states into that orbit. He thought the U.S. would remain a rogue state—and the danger of doing even worse things would remain—until there was full accountability for the program.

* * *

Given where the country is at now, I reached out to Mark Fallon again. When we spoke last week, I asked him what he thinks of our current moment, and whether America is still a rogue state.

He noted that the cabinet nominees put forward so far are in many cases the negation of the agencies Trump is inviting them to run. Each one exemplifies the opposite of the values of the institutions he wants them to lead.

“These nominees appear to be those who will destroy or hinder the internal workings of government,” he said, “which even Al Qaeda failed to do.”"

— Andrea Pitzer, America as a Rogue State: Trump’s malicious chaos targets democracy at home and around the world. Degenerate Art, November 19, 2024

soldier with girls

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Inclusive gay & Jewish community since the 1970s

Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum says:

"The Jewish community was behind the Christian, especially the Protestant community was — In the '60s There were Proetstant priests and ministers who were great leaders of the LGBT movement or lesbian and gay movement. And in 1973 when CBST was founded, there was not a single rabbi, not a single Jewish organization, not a single synagogue, not a single Jewish civil rights organization which supported gay rights. So CBST was founded and the LGBT movement was founded by lesbians and gay men in quite a hostile environment. Really before synagogues like CBST started, or BCC in Los Angeles which was three months beore CBST, you had to make a choice: you had to either...live a gay life but there was no way you could go into a Jewish community, or you could live a Jewish life and sublimate or live a secret life or live a hidden life as a gay person. So it wasn't until 19 — the end of '72 or '73 that there was anything in the Jewish world that was different."
start at 35:35, and focusing especially starting at 37:29–38:42
Beth Chayim Chadashim (BCC) — Los Angeles
Beit Simchat Torah (CBST) — New York
flower

Kleinbaum goes on to cite Evan Wolfson, Paul Kaplan, Larry Kramer as Jewish leaders for LGBT civil rights.

Monday, November 18, 2024

Seen on Bluesky: 'the trans protagonist *literally* defeats the villain with her transness'

here's another clip from the trans cartoon episode Disney pulled a few days ago, where the trans protagonist *literally* defeats the villain with her transness (with Unlock It by Charli in the background!!) this would have changed my life when i was a kid (content warning: some flashing lights)

[image or embed]

— sara (@sara.lgbtq.social) November 17, 2024 at 8:57 AM

its so gutting to see representation this good finally being made, only to be axed by bigots the whole damn episode is beautiful. her transness being "against the rules" of the system leads them to realize that the only way to win is by <breaking the system> its awesome. you should download it:

[image or embed]

— sara (@sara.lgbtq.social) November 17, 2024 at 9:00 AM
kid in roller skates kicking a ball on a rainbow background. screenshot from the video shared on Bluesky

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

On the US election postmortem

"Yet the roots of Trumpism extend many years before 2015. I first came across them in 1994, when the Democrats lost both houses of Congress in what was then termed a “repudiation” of the Democratic Party.

Trumpism is the consequence, not the cause, of a long-term structural change in the American political economy.

Over much of the past 30 years, as the Republican Party embraced bigotry, lies, and hate to stir up working-class fears and resentments, the Democratic Party abandoned the working class and embraced global trade, deregulation of finance, and lower taxes on the wealthy, and has allowed corporate bashing of labor unions and monopolization of industry.

As a result, the median wage of the bottom 90 percent has risen just 15 percent, adjusted for inflation, while the stock market has soared 5000 percent."

To its credit, the Biden administration is the first Democratic administration in more than 30 years to reject additional moves toward globalization and deregulation, propose higher taxes on the wealthy, strengthen labor unions, aggressively utilize antitrust, and adapt a forward-looking industrial policy.

But these measures require years to take effect, and many working-class Americans have not yet benefited from them.

— Robert Reich, Who are we? Nov 7, 2024


"I’m not interested in participating in the circular firing squad of why Trump won and Harris lost. Because I don’t think messaging or strategy would have overcome this. Much like in 2016, I’m not sure there’s anything Harris could have realistically done to turn the tide. And as much as folks might not want to hear this I think her team ran a good campaign and Trump ran a terrible one. It just didn’t matter in the end."

— Melissa Ryan, Clarity: I don’t have all the answers, but here’s where I’m at today. Ctrl Alt Right Delete, Nov 6, 2024


"Harris decried Trump as a fascist, a petty tyrant. She called him divisive, angry, aggrieved. And that was a smart case to make if, deep down, most voters held democracy dear (except maybe they didn’t) and if so many of them weren’t already angry (except they were). If all America needed was an articulate case for why Trump was bad, then Harris was the right candidate with the right message at the right moment. The prosecutor who would defeat the felon.

But the voters heard her case, and they still found for the defendant. A politician who admires dictators and says he’ll be one for a day, whose former top aides regard as a threat to the Constitution — a document he believes can be “terminated” when it doesn’t suit him — has won power not for one day but for nearly 1,500 more. What was considered abnormal, even un-American, has been redefined as acceptable and reaffirmed as preferable."

— Carlos Lozada, Stop Pretending Trump is Not Who We Are, New York Times, November 6, 2024

purple flower

"Things like $15 an hour, labor law reform, and the care agenda...would have immediately been felt in working families’ homes," said Heather McGhee, but Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin (Democrats) blocked those Democratic victories. Whereas things like "a long-term infrastructure plan" and "dethroning neoliberalism, dealing with antitrust, and creating new manufacturing jobs...feel very long-term and it’s easy to confuse who gets credit for it." To win, the Democrats needed policies with "immediacy and marketability." Apparently "people are more enthralled with a $300 stimulus check signed by Donald Trump than they are with the highest rate of manufacturing since the 1970s," and in Missouri they voted for "$15 an hour and abortion rights" yet "reject[ed] the Democratic Party that stands for these things."

How to compete with the right-wing meaning-making media machine: Writer and policy wonk Heather McGhee on how Democrats failed to reach voters on policy, why having Beyoncé on your side isn't enough, and what it will take to build a left media in the Trump years. The Ink, Nov 11, 2024

"I recently heard someone say, “Republicans work to control the weather, and Democrats wait for it to rain then fight over which umbrella to use.” It stopped me mid-sip of coffee. Like many of you, I’ve been sitting with the tremendous loss that took place last week at the ballot box—the loss of not just the presidency, but the Senate, and now, the House as well; a full trifecta of power now firmly in the hands of Trump, Elon Musk, and the guy who was investigated for sex trafficking who will now lead the Justice Department. I don’t know how to reconcile any of it, including the painful fact that the design of our disconnection as Americans was so well orchestrated and so well executed. It is humbling: how well we all got played and how much we will all suffer because of it, whether you voted for this reality or not. “Pick your pain,” a friend said to me, “One way or another, it’s coming.”"

— Amber Tamblyn, Lean Into the Hard Lesson of Loss: On steep election learning curves, tilting toward the promise of a stronger coalition, and a second live gathering over Zoom this month, because I love you. Nov 14, 2024

Trump secured his victory by just a cumulative 237,000 votes in three states that, had they gone the other way, would have meant victory for Harris." nyt

— Ewart, Dave (@davidewart.bsky.social) November 18, 2024 at 1:20 AM

Earlier today the NY Times made a reference to a 4-page memo written by Seth London to build "a party within the [Democratic] party," a new moderate faction to spread influence. I have the memo. It's a blueprint for a new Democratic Leadership Council. Explicitly so:

[image or embed]

— David Dayen (@ddayen.bsky.social) November 27, 2024 at 1:11 PM

The document is a battle plan to identify and cultivate elected officials, a PAC run by Lis Smith, a new think tank, a new media organ populated with old faves, and some state-level organs modeled on a thing in Texas, where Dems have consistently lost support since 2018.

[image or embed]

— David Dayen (@ddayen.bsky.social) November 27, 2024 at 1:16 PM

Post-election, a hopeful way of thinking

The election outcome was overall bad. But here are some of the election wins, as collected by Popular Information:

  • "Voters protect abortion rights in seven states"
  • "Voters in three red states guarantee paid sick leave; two boost minimum wage"
  • "Three states vote to protect public school funding"
  • "Florida voters reject school board politicization"
  • "Florida attorney suspended by DeSantis wins reelection"
  • "Voters elect first transgender member of Congress; send two Black women to the Senate"

— Judd Legum, Rebecca Crosby, and Noel Sims, Through the darkness, some rays of light, Popular Information, Nov 7, 2024


"How will we conduct this resistance?

By organizing our communities. By fighting through the courts. By arguing our cause through the media."

— Robert Reich, The Resistance Starts Now: I still have faith in America, but we must mobilize to protect those at risk if Trump achieves his worst impulses. Nov 6, 2024

Reich continued:

"The work includes:

  • Monitoring Trump and his government — despite the disinformation, propaganda, and lies we’ll be receiving — and disseminating the truth.
  • Maintaining a watch over the people and institutions we value.
  • Being ready to sound the alarm in our communities and networks when those people and institutions are under assault.
  • Organizing and mobilizing nonviolent resistance to such assaults.
  • Using civil disobedience wherever possible.
  • Litigating through state and federal courts where possible.
  • Speaking out against malicious lies like those that spread during the election by Elon Musk on his propaganda machine X and against vicious lies amplified on other MAGA mouthpieces.
  • Using our economic muscle to boycott corporations that support Trump, Musk, and other centers of MAGA power."

Robert Reich, What will YOU do?: Acknowledging what we are up against, Nov 12, 2024


"American Democracy, as we know it, is likely over. That creates space for something new to emerge. I don’t have a crystal ball, so I can’t tell you exactly what will happen next. But I know what Trump and MAGA want America to become and that they’re empowered to make a lot of it happen. We keep competing by the rules even though the competition is rigged, and every cycle, our opponents find ways to rig the system even more in their favor. Personally, I’ve never been more open to new ideas and things I haven’t considered before. Not because I don’t think democracy can work but because I think achieving a true multiracial democracy will mean rebuilding from the ground up. I’d encourage us to be open to new ways of thinking and systems for change. Because the space for that now exists."

— Melissa Ryan, Clarity: I don’t have all the answers, but here’s where I’m at today. Ctrl Alt Right Delete, Nov 6, 2024

quilt

"Trump’s foreign policy worldview has been clear ever since he entered political life. He believes that the U.S.-created liberal international order has, over time, stacked the deck against the United States. To change that imbalance, Trump wants to restrict inward economic flows such as imports and immigrants (although he likes inward foreign direct investment). He wants allies to shoulder more of the burden for their own defense. And he believes that he can cut deals with autocrats, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin or North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, that will reduce tensions in global trouble spots and allow the United States to focus inward.

Equally clear are Trump’s preferred means of getting what he wants in world politics. The former and future president is a strong believer in using coercion, such as economic sanctions, to pressure other actors. He also subscribes to the “madman theory,” in which he will threaten massive tariff increases or “fire and fury” against other countries in the firm belief that such threats will compel them into offering greater concessions than they otherwise would. At the same time, however, Trump also practices a transactional view of foreign policy, demonstrating a willingness during his first term to link disparate issues to secure economic concessions.

* * *

During the [2024] campaign, Trump promised to bomb Mexico and to deport legal immigrants, called opposition politicians the “enemies from within,” and claimed that migrants were “poisoning the blood” of the country. Despite all this—or perhaps because of it—Trump won a popular majority. When the rest of the world looks at Trump, they will no longer see an aberrant exception to American exceptionalism; they will see what America stands for in the twenty-first century."

— Daniel W. Drezner, The End of American Exceptionalism: Trump’s Reelection Will Redefine U.S. Power, Foreign Affairs, November 12, 2024

Friday, November 8, 2024

Everyone needs a planet. Offer enemies a way not to be enemies.

Margaret Killjoy today:

"Remember that everyone has skin in this game, even if some people have more than others. We all rely on a livable biosphere. Anyone with any ounce of conscience is threatened by a fascist government. It’s okay to be fighting for your own future as well, whatever your identity, and it’s important to not let identity divide us (despite the fact that we need to recognize that those of different identities will be impacted differently). We should not flatten our differences, we should celebrate them. And not let them divide us. Because, as always, we need to

Deescalate all conflict that isn’t with the enemy.

We need to offer an offramp for people on the right wing. We need to offer people the chance to deradicalize away from fascism. This isn’t to say we need to be nice to our enemies, just that we need to make it clear that they have the option of no longer being our enemies."

The Sky is Falling; We've Got This or: yes it's bad, no we need not despair. Margaret Killjoy. Nov 6, 2024

Read more selected quotations on "The US has an election result. What will we do now?"

fawn in woods

Project 2025 explainers: How it'll affect journalists & LGBTQ people

Joshua Benton writes for NiemanLab:

"When some of the detailed proposals within Project 2025 — banning abortion pills, slashing climate regulations, criminalizing pornography, abolishing the Department of Education, mass deportations, to name only a few — gained public attention, Trump claimed to “know nothing about” it — despite the thicket of his own appointees who produced it.

Still, there was one element of Project 2025 I haven’t seen spelled out at length: its plans for the news media."

These include:

"Make it easier to seize journalists’ emails and phone records."
"Consider booting reporters out of the White House."
"Kill funding for NPR, PBS, and public broadcasting."
"Put Voice of America under the president’s command — or shut it down entirely."
"Limit advertising for prescription drugs."
"Punish former officials who speak to reporters."
"Ban TikTok…"
"…remove restrictions on media ownership…"
"…and eliminate Section 230 protections."

Joshua Benton, What would Project 2025 do for (or to) journalism?: From defunding NPR and PBS to kicking reporters out of the White House, it’s an array of conservative priorities and Trumpian retreads. NiemanLab, Sept. 25, 2024

See also:

What is Project 2025? And what does it mean for LGBTQ+ Americans? Far-right activists have put together a series of directives for the next conservative president. Here's what it would mean to the LGBTQ+ community. Trudy Ring, Out.com, November 6, 2024

Days after the election, Donald Trump Jr. was making violent comments about political opponents. (HuffPost, Nov 9)

On November 20, 2024, "Trump urged Republicans ... to nix a bipartisan bill that would give journalists greater protections under federal law. Trump wrote on his favorite social network that “REPUBLICANS MUST KILL THIS BILL!” ... Known as the PRESS Act, the Protect Reporters From Exploitative State Spying Act would prevent the government from forcing journalists to reveal their sources and limit the seizure of their data without their knowledge." (CNN)

"As part of their so-called '180-Day Playbook,' for instance, the folks behind Project 2025 have drafted hundreds of executive orders in their efforts to prepare a more efficient, more ruthless rightwing regime." — Thomas Zimmer, November 27, 2024

man holding his hand out in rejection

Speaking of Meta's policy organization, a Project 2025 author is a director of policy at Meta. www.yahoo.com/news/project...

[image or embed]

— Daniel Malmer (@malmer.com) November 28, 2024 at 8:13 AM

Trump’s FBI Director nominee Kash Patel said he will prosecute and jail Americans who Trump deems “the enemy”: “We will go out and find the conspirators... Yes, we are going to come after the people in the media”

[image or embed]

— Parker Butler (@parkerbutler.bsky.social) November 30, 2024 at 7:04 PM

Here's an entire thread

We asked journalists around the world who have endured attacks on press freedom what advice they would give their American colleagues. We have collected their wise and remarkable responses in a special issue of @niemanreports.org. “Dear America,” they wrote.

[image or embed]

— Ann Marie Lipinski (@amlwhere.bsky.social) November 27, 2024 at 3:31 PM

Meanwhile

Last month, I fell down an absolutely bizarre rabbit hole trying to figure out who was ripping off articles from Oregon journalists. What I found was identity theft, plagiarism and an absolutely terrifying future for local journalism led by AI scammers. My latest:

[image or embed]

— Ryan Haas (@ryanjhaas.bsky.social) December 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM

What's going to happen

Justin Cox, "The Forthcoming First Amendment Fight," December 17, 2024:

"Brandon Carr will be the next FCC Chair and have the power to define what the media can and cannot do. While journalistic integrity is instrumental to democracy, Carr has been clear that right only extends to views he agrees with. Carr’s assertions are a way of threatening publishers to self-censor in fear of upsetting their new overlord or face his wrath, which could include removing broadcast licenses. This is not protecting free speech. It’s taking advantage of a bully pulpit.

Andrew Ferguson will be the next FTC Chair and have the power to regulate businesses. Like Carr, Ferguson is on a mission to “hold big tech accountable and stop censorship.” Ferguson believes that social media algorithms intentionally block right-wing views, and he wants to fix it. It’s also worth mentioning that Ferguson wants to “fight back against the trans agenda,” which tells you about everything you need to know about this guy.

These guys want to remove private companies’ ability to regulate content to protect “free speech.” All they will end up doing is allowing hate speech to flourish and scare anyone from holding them accountable."

Famed News Editor Says Trump Is 'Salivating For The Opportunity To Prosecute Journalists' Martin Baron warned Tuesday that Trump will sue “a lot of media outlets" and "threaten advertisers" once he retakes the White House. Marco Margaritoff, HuffPost, Dec 19, 2024

Massachusetts AG: Be 'clear-eyed' about the 'challenges ahead'

Yesterday I learned:

"[Massachusetts] Gov. Maura Healey sued the Trump administration 96 times when she served as attorney general during his first term in office, and she won in 77% of those cases, according to The Boston Globe."

The day before, November 6, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell said "her office is 'ready to act' against potential threats from Trump’s administration." She said she was "clear-eyed that President-elect Trump has told us exactly what he intends to do as President, and that we need to believe him and to be ready for the challenges ahead."

— Lindsay Shachnow, Boston.com

“Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey said that she would refuse to assist in mass deportations in her state, and warned states of the pressure they will face to penalize and deport undocumented immigrants.” www.latintimes.com/massachusett...

[image or embed]

— Gabe Ortíz (@tusk81.bsky.social) November 7, 2024 at 6:31 PM

“Undocumented immigrants from China who are deemed to be of military age will be among the first groups targeted for deportation by the incoming Trump administration…”

[image or embed]

— Matt Novak (@paleofuture.bsky.social) November 15, 2024 at 2:03 PM
robot

"We’ve already seen how disastrous a Trump presidency can be for our country and our planet, and we know that his plans this time around are even worse.

* * *

During Donald Trump’s first term, he did everything in his power to reverse the progress our climate movement made to protect our planet from the greed and exploitation of the fossil fuel industry.

Now, we’re staring down an even more dangerous road. Trump plans to repeal major climate legislation, remove any protected status rules on federal lands and waters to allow for more drilling and mining, rescind EPA standards, and remove the U.S. once again from the Paris Climate Agreement. And that’s only the beginning."

— 350.org email today

Concentration camps. Republicans in Texas can’t wait to open concentration camps.

[image or embed]

— David Slack (@slack2thefuture.bsky.social) November 20, 2024 at 9:28 PM

Tom Homan makes clear that he's prepared to more or less go to war with cities that resist federal mass deportations

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) November 20, 2024 at 8:37 PM

“Texas authorities say they are prepared to offer President-elect Donald Trump 1,400-acres (567 hectares) of land along the US-Mexico border to build detention facilities for undocumented migrants.”

[image or embed]

— Juan Escalante (@juansaaa.com) November 20, 2024 at 9:14 PM

Team Trump Debates ‘How Much Should We Invade Mexico?’ In Trump’s government-in-waiting, the only question is how massive the U.S. assault on Mexican drug cartels should be. Asawin Suebsaeng, Andrew Perez, Rolling Stone, November 27, 2024

"California Sen. Alex Padilla (D) said Sunday the state had 'no obligation' to help President-elect Donald Trump enact his mass deportation plans, saying local officials will instead work to support migrants and undocumented immigrants."
Trump 'Has It In For California,' State Will Not Help Deportation Plans, Senator Says. “There doesn't have to be a conflict, unless that's what Trump wants," Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla said. Nick Visser, Dec 2, 2024

When asked about Trump's plans for mass deportations, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she supports immigrants with legal papers but would be "the first one to call up ICE" to deport undocumented immigrants accused of crimes. @rebeccaclewis.bsky.social reports for @cityandstateny.bsky.social:

[image or embed]

— Peter Sterne (@petersterne.com) November 26, 2024 at 6:39 PM

Kansas Attorney General is a Trump ally

A Key Trump Ally On Immigration Explains How Mass Deportations Could Work Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has for two decades been one of the most influential lawyers in the Republican movement to restrict illegal immigration. John Hanna, AP logo, Dec 19, 2024

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Trump & the microphone

Yesterday, when I woke up to see the headline that Donald Trump mimicked oral sex on his microphone, I mentioned it briefly.

A.R. Moxon makes the same point today:

"I woke up yesterday morning to learn that Don Trump—the famed rapist, convicted felon, and white christian presidential candidate—had mimed performing a blowjob on his microphone stand to the clear delight of his crowd.
There's a famous Christian thinker named Jesus H. Christ who you may have heard about; people will often say his full name when they see things like this.
* * *
Blowing his mic stand is not even the thousandth most repugnant thing Trump has done, but it's notable given that his crowd is a well-scrubbed gang of mostly well-off white christian supremacists who have spent the last decade demanding the exclusion and persecution and death of (among others) trans people and other queer people. They claim this is is because they want to protect their children from sexualized imagery and abuse and pedophiles. Never mind, though, their hero sucked off his microphone and they laughed and clapped and cheered."
— A.R. Moxon, Apology Not Accepted, The Reframe, Nov 3, 2024

LGBTQ: What's at stake for us in a Harris–Trump election

Toward a Harris Victory: How to Respond to MAGA's Anti-LGBTQ Messaging

antique statue of beast with phallic head and neck

Republicans sure have been running anti-trans ads

In the 2024 election, the Republicans have spent over $120 million in anti-trans ads.

"In 2022, Republicans in Michigan made a major mistake: They spent more money on anti-transgender ads than on reinforcing economic messaging. As a result, Democrats won a trifecta in the state for the first time in 40 years. Now, there are signs Republicans may be repeating the same error. A new set of polls in the crucial "blue wall" swing states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania shows that Harris is matching Trump on the economy. This is happening as Trump spends more money on anti-trans advertising than immigration, housing, and the economy combined.
* * *
In 2022, Republicans spent $50 million on anti-trans advertising. One of the primary focuses of that spending was Michigan, where they used the ads to target Democrats as well as Issue 3, an abortion rights amendment. This is similar to how Republicans are targeting abortion rights amendments today by saying reproductive freedom will codify "transgender healthcare" into law. These ads failed; Issue 3 passed, and Democrats took the trifecta in the state for the first time in 40 years. They faced similar losses in every other swing state where similar ads were deployed."
Harris Surges On Economy Voters In Swing States As Trump Fixates On Anti-Trans Ads: The latest polls from swing states reveal that Trump may be repeating the same mistake that cost Republicans many races in 2022. Erin Reed, Nov 1, 2024

The candidates' policies are learnable.

"LGBTQ advocates fear the intensified campaign will sow fear and hate against a group that makes up less than 1% of the U.S. adult population, per an analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data -- and which already experiences high rates of discrimination and violence.
* * *
Here's what we know about the issues and how each candidate expects to legislate transgender policies."
— Kiara Alfonseca, Election fact check: Donald Trump, Kamala Harris on transgender issues: Trans issues have played a key role in the Republican campaign. ABC News, November 1, 2024

2024 history

"This September, at the annual Moms for Liberty summit in Washington, DC, Former President Donald Trump doubled down on anti-trans rhetoric with the totally false claim that schools were performing gender-reassignment surgeries on kids, saying "Think of it, your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation." He repeated those claims again at a rally in Tucson." — Imara Jones, founder and creator of TransLash Media, "What's at Stake for Trans People in This Election," Newsweek, October 15, 2024

Jones continues:

"The reason that this lie about kids has become a talking point in the general election is because of a long-standing coordinated right-wing effort to spread vast quantities of medical misinformation about transgender people and make the debate over "gender ideology" a mainstream topic."

And:

"How anti-trans politics became a core pillar of the Republican Party isn't a mystery. At TransLash Media, we've exposed how institutions like the Heritage Foundation spent decades incepting anti-trans medical misinformation into the public dialogue and creating a focus on trans identity as a core motivating issue for Republican voters."

Update: He spent $215 million.

See also

Donald Trump spewed anti-trans lies at Tucson rally for 7 minutes. Here are the claims debunked: The lies about children transitioning, Olympic athletes, and more just keep on coming. Trudy Ring, Advocate, September 16 2024

Voters Prefer Candidates Who Are Supportive of Transgender Rights, Think Recent Political Ads Have Gotten Mean-Spirited and Out of Hand, Data for Progress, October 24, 2024

— My essay, The $120 Million Anti-Trans Joke. It's a 3-min read on Medium.

dog

What Can We Make of Polling on Trans Issues? Riki Wilchins, Assigned Media, November 18, 2024

Were the ads to blame for Harris's loss? No, argues Mady: Countering the Narrative: 14 Reasons Why Trans Rights Shouldn't Be Blamed For Kamala Harris's Election Loss: A Comprehensive Data-informed Report. Dec 1, 2024

Oh, a month after the election, even before taking office, Trump admits he won't be able to do anything to bring down consumer prices.

Iker Seisdedos interviewing Judith Butler:

"Q. The phantasm seemed to work for Trump’s campaign. One of his slogans was: “Kamala’s for they/them. President Trump is for you.” The issue was whether or not to give gender treatment to the migrant inmate population, which is a tiny portion of the society. But that, and Harris’ failure to refute it, was a powerful reason for the Republican victory.
A. I doubt that that was the reason for his victory. People were already living with many fears about the economy, war, climate catastrophe, and Trump knew how to exploit and repackage those fears to scapegoat minorities. That message appealed to anxiety. Trump put his anti-migrant discourse together with his anti-trans and anti-feminist discourse: Harris, the woke, the Marxist, the feminist, Black and brown, who presumably supports trans surgery (terrifying) on migrants who flooded over the border (also terrifying). On the left, we don’t know how to appeal to people’s deep passions. We think we’re very smart and very critical. But where’s the radical imaginary by which people will be passionately absorbed? I did not like the blame game that started after the defeat. I did not like the pundits who said: “Oh, we didn’t realize how anti-trans and anti-migrant people are.”
Q. It wasn’t just Trumpism. Some Democratic voices say it’s time to move beyond the issue of trans rights in areas like sports, which affect very few people.
A. You could say that about the Jews, Black people or Haitians, or any very vulnerable minority. Once you decide that a single vulnerable minority can be sacrificed, you’re operating within a fascist logic, because that means there might be a second one you’re willing to sacrifice, and a third, a fourth, and then what happens?"
Judith Butler, philosopher: ‘If you sacrifice a minority like trans people, you are operating within a fascist logic’, Iker Seisdedos, El Pais, December 14, 2024

I like my echo chamber

resolved: people who insist that all social media sites must be places where users are constantly encountering and arguing with people over fundamental disagreement do so because their actual, real lives are echo chambers where they do not encounter any meaningful difference from day-to-day.

— jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) November 16, 2024 at 1:12 PM

"Echo chamber" is used to criticize people who seek out online spaces and news sources that aren't overtly hostile to us.

You can certainly find people who are opposed to conservative ideology arguing with conservatives, and they are saying all the same things, too. This is also to be expected. I’d say repetition is exactly what you can expect from people who have decided to spend their time persuading unpersuadable people. What that tells me is not that “both sides” are in an echo chamber, but rather it is specifically when debating with unreasonable people to try to persuade them with reason that reason starts to sound as nothing more than an echo of unreason, one of two equal and equivalent sides, as supremacists bring their old predictable lies in support of their positions, and those who oppose them bring the old predictable truths to counter them, until the lies and the truths get mixed up in an overlapping wash of sound.

In worst case scenarios, supremacists even learn to echo their opposition’s own words back at them in twisted ways. Grooming is a real thing, and it’s a real problem, and the people who engage in it are really protected by supremacists, but once the supremacist spirit learned about the term “grooming,” they sharpened the other side and used the word to demonize the trans community, without ceasing their defense of groomers or the institutions that shelter groomers in the least. In fact, using the term “groomers” enhances their defense of groomers, because if you accuse them of grooming (which they are) you now sound just like them, who accuse you of grooming (which you aren’t), and my god but the word “groomer” has lost all meaning in this sentence, which certainly benefits those who defend groomers.

More than that, it helps them establish supremacists, who defend groomers, as the ones who truly oppose grooming.

Preaching To The Choir. A.R. Moxon. The Reframe. September 17, 2023.

This, I think, is a corollary of all the shame and pathologizing of kids who are different in our culture—an outsize pride taken in kids who seem to check all the boxes, meet all the social standards, are perfect little children. Children in need of protecting, keeping pure from all transgressors. So many of the battles waged in the Mirror World—the “anti-woke” laws, the “don’t say gay” bills, the blanket bans on gender-affirming medical care, the school board wars over vaccines and masks—come down to the same question: What are children for? Are they their own people, and our job, as parents, is to support and protect them as they find their paths? Or are they our appendages, our extensions, our spin-offs, our doubles, to shape and mold and ultimately benefit from? So many of these parents seem convinced that they have a right to exert absolute control over their children without any interference or input: control over their bodies (by casting masks and vaccines as a kind of child rape or poisoning); control over their minds (by casting anti-racist education as the injection of foreign ideas into the minds of their offspring); control over their gender and sexuality (by casting any attempt to discuss the range of possible gender expressions and sexual orientations as “grooming”).

This same inability to see children as autonomous beings is part of the reason why, for so long, disabled children were hidden away in cruel institutions. If a double that reflects well on them is what many parents are after, then disability arrives as an unwelcome interruption to those best-laid plans. Or, in today’s language, if your kid is your brand extension, then having a child who challenges social standards of normalcy might mean that your whole personal brand is in crisis.

— Naomi Klein. Doppelganger: A Trip into the Mirror World. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023.

Complaints about Bluesky being a "left wing enclave" can be safely ignored because they fail to account for the fact that Twitter now privileges and amplifies right wing extremism and no one is obligated to put up with that as a condition of using social media

— Ian Boudreau (@iboudreau.bsky.social) October 19, 2024 at 9:47 AM

I do not want to see Nazis or spend time trying to understand the motivations of Nazis and if that means that I am part of an “echo chamber” sign me up also nobody calling it that has ever spent five minutes trying to get leftists to agree on anything

[image or embed]

— Micah (@rincewind.run) October 19, 2024 at 12:00 PM

anyway, platforms like X are absurd

This strikes me as an apt description of X:

"Much of the information on X is a mixture of irrelevance and falsehood. This morning, thanks to X giving me content I didn’t ask for, I saw an exchange that was characteristic. Nate Silver, the polling analyst, asserted that Kamala Harris was a mediocre presidential candidate. His underlying post gave reasons. This triggered an enraged response from a progressive who considered Silver’s point to be racist, I guess. This, in turn, was shared by some right-wing account that falsely identified the angry progressive as the leader of the Democratic Party. This, in turn, was shared by a billionaire, and then X put this concoction in front of me: a credulous person sharing a falsehood about an angry reaction about an opinion that I didn’t particularly need to begin with."
Steve Inskeep, The decline of social media is good: It’s been terrible at helping us think. Nov 17, 2024

You can vote without feeling 'ride or die' about your choice

I think that, as a society, it would be better if we all internalised the idea that - in all fields - having a preference, even a strong one, for something doesn't necessarily mean you're absolutely ride or die for that thing.

— Small Robots (@smolrobots.bsky.social) November 3, 2024 at 8:11 AM

Like, there is a vast gulf of opinion between liking pancakes and liking pancakes so much you're willing to murder over being served waffles.

— Small Robots (@smolrobots.bsky.social) November 3, 2024 at 8:13 AM
sketch of a horse looking surprised

Saturday, November 2, 2024

The radicalism of SCOTUS

quilt

"Mitch McConnell has promised that if Republicans regain control of the Senate in 2022, that he will not let Biden put any more Supreme Court justices on the bench. He would keep seats open for up to 6 years if he had to. 3/n" — Brynn Tannehill on X, May 9, 2022

Patrick Wyman on X, June 24, 202: The Supreme Court is a structural problem, and it requires structural solutions, which the people responsible for providing are unable to formulate because they a) don’t recognize the structural nature of the issue and b) don’t know how to wield power to fix it even if they did. That’s why all of this feels so hopeless - the elected officials who promise to “fight” are just shilling for campaign contributions and shitposting, they have no actual way of fighting because they can’t grasp the scale or nature of the problem, much less its solutions

"They have created a precedent for overturning precedent," Louise Melling of the American Civil Liberties Union said in an interview Monday. She called the current court "radical" and is stunned that the majority could overturn a case that "is so fundamental to the lives of women and the lives of families."

Melling pointed to the dissent penned by the court's three liberals and said she hoped that one day the court would respect stare decisis again.

* * *

"In the abortion opinion, Justice Samuel Alito provided two pages of footnotes highlighting other cases that have been overturned, in an effort to prove that stare decisis isn't what he called an "inexorable command." And he explained his criteria for overturning precedent."

— Ariane de Vogue, "The Supreme Court just threw the idea of settled law out the window," CNN, June 28, 2022

In 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges, writes Madiba K. Dennie in The Originalism Trap, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution is meant to protect "the right of all persons to enjoy liberty as we learn its meaning." That seemed to be a "game changer," since it would not be necessary to discover the legal history of a certain behavior to demonstrate what courts should do today about it.

"A new door was opened," Dennie writes, "for the public to advance arguments about the constitutional requirements of dignity, equality, and liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment," yielding "interpretative possibilities" based on

"decades of dialogue between advocates and the people they represent, the judiciary, and other actors engaged in explicating interconnected constitutional principles. The rights and freedoms the due process cases upheld—including same-sex and interracial marriage, decriminalized same-sex intimacy, contraception, abortion, privacy and autonomy, and equal dignity—built on each other like blocks in human rights Jenga. But then, originalists pulled the Roe v. Wade block out. Their legitimation of the dissenting arguments in prior abortion and gay rights cases has destabilized the whole human rights tower, and the country is left wondering which block will be next to fall." (Chapter 2: Stealing Our Liberties)

The Constitution makes ONE simple demand of officeholders. Like instructing Adam & Eve to lay off the fruit, the Framers said, "you may want a fancy European title but the nation's integrity demands you refuse." Alito just ignored the Constitution's command.

[image or embed]

— Joe Patrice (@joepatrice.bsky.social) October 31, 2024 at 1:28 PM

This is the funniest thing for a Supreme Court justice to get impeached for, and so absolutely perfect for Samuel Alito. Say what you will about his opinions, but he has always been likely to go down for accepting a bejeweled scepter from the most racist living member of the Bourbon dynasty.

[image or embed]

— David_j_roth (@davidjroth.bsky.social) November 1, 2024 at 12:02 PM

Friday, November 1, 2024

Trump is making violent comments about Liz Cheney

HuffPost headline TRUMP VIOLENT FANTASY - IMAGINES CHENEY SHOOTING - GUNS 'TRAINED ON HER FACE'

"Trump made his comments after he referred to his full pardon of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the ex-chief of staff of Dick Cheney who in 2007 was convicted on felony charges of perjury and obstruction of justice related to a CIA leak scandal.

On Thursday, Trump claimed that Dick Cheney once called him to describe the 2018 pardon of Libby as “one of the nicest things I’ve seen done in politics.”

“And I don’t blame him for sticking with his daughter but his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb,” said Trump, who has reportedly made over 100 public threats to his perceived foes."

Trump Attacks 'War Hawk' Liz Cheney With Gun-Filled Fantasy: 'Trained On Her Face': Trump went after the GOP former representative with a wave of violent imagery. Ben Blanchet, HuffPost, Nov 1, 2024

The reason Trump hates Liz Cheney is because she co-chaired this investigation:

Wikipedia: United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

There is no reason for Trump to be talking about Liz Cheney. She doesn't hold office anymore. Two years ago, the Republican National Committee voted to censure her, and she lost her reelection primary later that year.

Liz Cheney on X, Nov 1, 2024: This is how dictators destroy free nations. They threaten those who speak against them with death. We cannot entrust our country and our freedom to a petty, vindictive, cruel, unstable man who wants to be a tyrant. #Womenwillnotbesilenced #VoteKamala

Trump nominated Matt Gaetz for attorney general. This "lays bare the depth of Trump’s contempt for our vital national law enforcement apparatus and his determination to use it as a blunt instrument to seek revenge on his opponents," said the editorial board of Florida’s Sun Sentinel. (November 14, 2024)

In case you missed it

Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?

The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...