Thursday, May 29, 2025

U.S. judges feel threatened

Recently:

Amid rising tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, some federal judges are beginning to discuss the idea of managing their own armed security force.

The notion came up in a series of closed-door meetings in early March, when a group of roughly 50 judges met in Washington for a semiannual meeting of the Judicial Conference, a policymaking body for the federal judiciary. There, members of a security committee spoke about threats emerging as President Trump stepped up criticism of those who rule against his policies.

Dozens of judges and their relatives have received anonymous pizza deliveries to their homes—which they perceived as a “we know where you live” message. In March, five days after the Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s ruling that the administration must pay USAID contractors, Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s sister was targeted with a bomb threat, according to police records. Another judge had a SWAT team called on him after he overturned an executive order restricting birthright citizenship.

Judges Weigh Taking Control of Their Own Security Amid Threats U.S. marshals, sworn to protect federal judges, ultimately answer to President Trump, who has ramped up criticism of the judiciary. By Katherine Long, James Fanelli, C. Ryan Barber. Wall Street Journal, May 24, 2025

Now:

The White House deepened its attacks on the judiciary on Wednesday [May 28] as it hit back at a federal court decision striking down President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs.

“[Trade] deficits have created a national emergency that has decimated American communities,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai told HuffPost in a statement. “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency.”

And White House senior adviser Stephen Miller went even further, claiming in a post on X that “the judicial coup is out of control.”

White House Lashes Out At Judges After Court Blocks Trump's Tariffs A senior adviser alleged a "judicial coup" in renewed broadsides against the courts. By Li Zhou, HuffPost, May 28, 2025

Unsullied eunuch soldiers stand in formation in Game of Thrones

Relatedly: Trump's circle, says Maggie Haberman, saw Elon Musk as "a source of tension, and he commanded this social media presence where he could intimidate any of them as well. And so I think, you know, they are happy to see this chapter end." (HuffPost, June 2, 2025)

Also:

"President Donald Trump has privately complained that the Supreme Court justices he appointed have not sufficiently stood behind his agenda, according to multiple sources familiar with the conversations. But he has directed particular ire at Justice Amy Coney Barrett, his most recent appointee, one of the sources said.

The behind-closed-doors grievances have been wide-ranging, and while many have been about Barrett, Trump has also expressed frustration about Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, the sources familiar with the matter said. The complaints have gone on for at least a year, the sources said.

The president’s anger, sources said, has been fueled by allies on the right, who have told Trump privately that Barrett is “weak” and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench in 2020.

* * *

Last week, as Trump raged over a three-judge panel’s decision against his tariff plan, he took aim at Federalist Society leader Leonard Leo, who played a major role in helping Trump identify judges to put on the federal bench.

In a Truth Social post, Trump called Leo a “real ‘sleazebag’ … a bad person, who in his own way, probably hates America.”"

Trump privately complains about Amy Coney Barrett and other Supreme Court justices he nominated, Kristen Holmes and John Fritze, CNN, June 3, 2025

Trump fears Musk:

"On Tuesday [June 3], MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell suggested why the typically “explosively rageful” president has not yet said a thing.

It boils down to Trump actually being afraid of Musk and the way he could weaponize his vast wealth against him, said “The Last Word” anchor.

“That is how you know who Donald Trump fears in this world,” he said. “If you attack Donald Trump and Donald Trump says nothing, Donald Trump’s silence is the biggest expression of fear that he has.”

— Lee Moran, Lawrence O’Donnell Reveals Why Donald Trump Hasn’t Dared To Clap Back At Elon Musk Yet: The “explosively rageful” president hasn’t said a thing, and the MSNBC anchor suggested why. HuffPost, June 4, 2025

Judges are politicized:

Trump's appellate judges have formed a nearly united phalanx to defend his agenda from legal challenges. How often they ruled for him in 2025: Trump appointees: 92% Other Republican appointees: 68% Democratic appointees: 27% @schwartzesque.bsky.social Emma Schartz www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/u...

[image or embed]

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt.bsky.social) January 11, 2026 at 9:43 AM

Stephen Miller understands that the criminal system is the most powerful on the state level, so he is going after local and state sovereignty.

[image or embed]

— Jessica Pishko (@jesspish.bsky.social) January 22, 2026 at 3:14 PM

Thursday, May 15, 2025

ChatGPT as a search engine

"I have not used ChatGPT, because as of yet, no one has held a shotgun to my head and made me do it." — Vince Gilligan (WATCH: Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan really hates AI, Simone De Rochefort, Polygon, Nov 7, 2025)

video still of Vince Gilligan. audio caption: a shotgun

Kids are taught to look things up, right? That basic recommendation assumed that available sources would contain facts. But now, there are LLMs, which are "nonsense machines." So looking things up is bad advice, or at least incomplete advice, given the widespread availability of a tool that lies to you. Otherwise kids are going to use the nonsense lying tool and believe they've learned something from it.

"They 'looked it up'! they got it from somewhere! ... it's something they think they LEARNED"

Well this is grim

[image or embed]

— Pavel (@spavel.bsky.social) July 6, 2024 at 5:15 PM

Schools were unprepared for this:

"at least in the early days, a total crapshoot: Some states claimed that they had not thought about ChatGPT at all, while other state departments of education brought in consulting firms to give trainings to teachers and principals about how to use ChatGPT in the classroom. Some of the trainings were given by explicitly pro-AI organizations and authors, and organizations backed by tech companies. The documents, taken in their totality, show that American public schools were wildly unprepared for students’ widespread adoption of ChatGPT, which has since become one of the biggest struggles in American education."
American Schools Were Deeply Unprepared for ChatGPT, Public Records Show, Jason Koebler, 404 Media, May 15, 2025

"Everyone participating in generative AI is polluting the data supply for everyone." AI is already eating itself: www.theregister.com/2025/06/15/a...

[image or embed]

— Doc Sarah Lonsdale (@sarahjlonsdale.bsky.social) June 22, 2025 at 2:23 AM

By the way, the president uses "AI" as a deflection to indicate something is false.

"The hundreds of billions of dollars companies are investing in AI now account for an astonishing 40 per cent share of US GDP growth this year... In a way, then, America has become one big bet on AI."

[image or embed]

— Justin Hendrix (@justinhendrix.bsky.social) October 6, 2025 at 6:05 AM

Look what a massive amount of the U.S. stock market is invested in "AI" companies.

Generative AI is a societal disaster: Governments are deluding themselves into believing investment justifies allowing AI to upend society. Don't buy the AI hype. by Paris Marx, Disconnect, October 24, 2025

"I DON'T NEED YOU TO FUCKING REWRITE WHAT I'VE JUST WRITTEN!"

[image or embed]

— Matthew Noe (@noethematt.bsky.social) October 28, 2025 at 5:46 AM

In 2022

The UK made it illegal to hire someone to write an essay for you. Yet there's nothing that can be done about machines writing the essay for you?

In 2025

Sam Altman of course says you need ChatGPT to know how to raise a baby.

Jimmy Fallon: "And do you use ChatGPT when raising your baby?" Sam Altman: "I cannot imagine figuring out how to raise a newborn without ChatGPT."

[image or embed]

— More Perfect Union (@moreperfectunion.bsky.social) December 9, 2025 at 10:01 AM

Guillermo del Toro gets it. variety.com/2026/film/ne...

[image or embed]

— Trey Lawson (@tlawson.bsky.social) January 4, 2026 at 10:55 PM

Happy to be included in this article with MIT Technology Review about the QuitGPT campaign. www.technologyreview.com/2026/02/10/1...

[image or embed]

— Dana R. Fisher (aka the Apocalyptic Optimist) (@fisherdanar.bsky.social) February 11, 2026 at 6:58 AM

Today's technology is designed to divorce us from ourselves.

"...the rapid promotion and acceptance of AI into our daily lives helps to ease us into this weird dysmorphic fascism we have moved into." Their goals are to "get rid of the pesky people who question things, keep tabs on all of us to keep us 'safe,' help distort reality so we are too tired to question everything, keep us disconnected from other humans, keep us 'efficient' (because white supremacy likes efficiency more than quality), get you to question everything and be too scared to trust your instincts—oh, and help destroy the planet because that takes away more of us, too." So, "don’t outsource your thinking to a data packet that serves a master who doesn’t care about you and who just wants to strip your essence and use it to fuel their quest for unlimited riches." (Black Girl in Maine)

Erin Maglaque [interviewed by Chandler Fritz]: It is true that the textureless authority of AI-generated writing makes us feel as if we are in the presence of an omniscient being. But we lose something important about being human if AI becomes our primary contact with the unknown, our primary experience of the inexplicable.

And what does that misplaced reverence say about us, about our capacity to contend with real mystery? AI is predictable by its design; that is how large language models work, through probability. Premodern mysticism was not concerned with the predictable or the probable, but with the opposite: with moments of irruption, of disabling wonder. Why do we want our gods to be so bland, our oracles so anemic? Do we get the gods we deserve?

— Interview in the New York Review of Books, emailed to subscribers, March 21, 2026

"And they just…took it. They took the best work of my mind and used it to build the very thing that is actively ruining just about everything all the time. They took the books I wrote for children and used them to make it possible for children to not bother with reading ever again. They took the books I wrote about love to create chatbots that isolate people and prevent them from finding human love in the real world, that make it difficult for them to even stand real love, which is not always agreeable, not always positive, not always focused on end-user engagement. They took the books I wrote about hope and glitter in the face of despair and oppression and used it to make a Despair-and-Oppression generator.

They took my heart and used it to replace me and everyone else."

— Catherynne M. Valente, Blood Money: The Anthropic Settlement: The actual audacity of it all, Welcome to Garbagetown, Mar 30, 2026

Don't use AI summaries for journalism either

Even after getting caught, he still basically just shrugs it off as user error, rather than the extremely obvious outcome of using a piece of software that has zero designed tendency towards accuracy beyond the human-created (stolen) inputs it relies upon archive.ph/wip/qMFtz

[image or embed]

— Ketan Joshi (@ketanjoshi.co) March 21, 2026 at 2:40 PM

In case you missed it

Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?

The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...