Skip to main content

Jay Sekulow, one of Trump's defense attorneys, receives $65 million in charitable funds

Yesterday the Associated Press published a most interesting article by Michael Biesecker. It is long. Here, I've summarized and reorganized the information.


Although the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), "as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization, is barred under IRS rules from engaging in partisan political activities," nevertheless a half-dozen ACLJ lawyers, including its chief counsel Jay Sekulow and his son, are part of Trump's legal defense team in the impeachment. "Charity watchdogs for years have raised concerns," the AP story explains, "about the blurred lines between for-profit businesses tied to Sekulow and the complex web of non-profit entities he and his family control."

An AP investigation "of tax returns for the ACLJ and other charities tied to Sekulow" found that between "2008 to 2017, the most recent year available, show that more than $65 million in charitable funds were paid to Sekulow, his wife, his sons, his brother, his sister-in-law, his nephew and corporations they own." The American Institute of Philanthropy's CharityWatch website placed a “Donor Alert” about the ACLJ.

One problem is with the way the charities are structured and led. In 1988, "Sekulow founded the non-profit Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism (CASE)," which fundraises over $50 million each year, "more than $12 million was paid in direct salary and benefits to Sekulow and his family members." Furthermore, "ACLJ now receives the bulk of its $23 million annual budget from CASE. All six of the [ACLJ] charity’s paid board members share the last name Sekulow, including Jay’s wife, Pam, and their sons, Jordon and Logan." This runs afoul of the Better Business Bureau's recommendation for the independence of board members; accordingly, the BBB Wise Giving Alliance has an advisory about ACLJ. Similarly, the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability requires independent boards, and "CASE and ACLJ are not listed among the council’s 2,400 members."

Another problem is with their connection to political work. Money for the Trump defense is being paid to the Constitutional Litigation and Advocacy Group (CLA Group), a for-profit "phantom law firm" whose contact information is a virtual or "flex-space" rented location. It is co-owned by Jay Sekulow, chief counsel at ACLJ, and Stuart J. Roth, senior counsel at ACLJ, both of who are Trump's defense lawyers. When contacted by the Associated Press, a PR professional paid by the ACLJ claimed that Sekulow's work for the president is done in Sekulow's "personal capacity" and has nothing to do with the ACLJ. (However, between 2008 and 2017, as the AP notes, "nearly $37 million in charitable funds were paid by ACLJ to the CLA Group." Of that, $5.8 million was paid in 2017 alone.) This same PR professional would not say "whether Sekulow was doing his legal work for Trump in the non-profit group’s office" nor whether ACLJ was being reimbursed by the CLA Group for anything related to the Trump defense.

These problems are related. The combined problem is that Jay Sekulow does political work, and the charities' money goes to Jay Sekulow and his colleagues. In 2017, ACLJ paid $1.4 million to Regency Productions, which receives Sekulow's fees for radio and television appearances. "Over the 10-year period reviewed by AP, CLA Group and Regency were paid a combined $46 million in charitable funds by ACLJ and CASE. Millions more were paid by the charities for 'airtime,' though the recipients of that money were not detailed in the tax records." The charities spent $1.2 million on private jets, plus millions of dollars "routed into numerous non-profit and for-profit entities, which makes it challenging to determine who is really getting the money." Some money was funneled to corporations headed by evangelical television personality Pat Robertson and former U.S. attorney general John Ashcroft.

From the AP story:

A 2005 investigation by the publication Legal Times reported about questionable spending at ACLJ, quoting former employees describing millions in charity funds being spent to support the Sekulows’ lavish lifestyle, which included multiple homes, golf junkets, chauffeur-driven cars and a private jet used to ferry then-Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. The Guardian and The Washington Post reported additional details in 2017, shortly after Sekulow was named as Trump’s lawyer.

Sekulow joined Trump's legal team during the Mueller investigation in 2017. Since that time, his CLA Group has received over $250,000 from the Republican National Committee. Also since 2017, North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein has been investigating the abuse of charitable funds related to Sekulow.

Trump, of course, is also under scrutiny for his own corruption. From the AP story:

Trump, Sekulow’s star client, has faced similar legal questions. Trump agreed to pay $2 million as part of a settlement with the state of New York in which he was forced to admit he misused charitable funds from the Donald J. Trump Foundation to promote his 2016 presidential campaign, pay off business debts and buy a $10,000 portrait of himself hung at one of his Florida resorts. Trump’s charity also cut an illegal $25,000 check to support the reelection of then-Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who now works with Sekulow as a member of the president’s defense team.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Castration at the Battle of Adwa (1896)

On March 1, 1896, the Battle of Adwa "cast doubt upon an unshakable certainty of the age – that sooner or later Africans would fall under the rule of Europeans." In this battle, Ethiopians beat back the invading Italians and forced them to retreat permanently. It was not until 1922 that Benito Mussolini would again initiate designs against Ethiopia; despite Ethiopia's defeat in 1936, the nation ultimately retained its independence. "Adwa opened a breach that would lead, in the aftermath of world war fifty years later, to the rollback of European rule in Africa. It was," Raymond Jonas wrote, "an event that determined the color of Africa." (p. 1) It was also significant because it upheld the power of Ethiopia's Christian monarchy that controlled an ethnically diverse nation (p. 333), a nation in which, in the late 19th century, the Christian Emperor Yohannes had tried to force Muslims to convert to Christianity. (p. 36)The Victorian English spelling…

Review of Cliff Sims' 'Team of Vipers' (2019)

After he resigned his position, Cliff Sims spent two months in Fall 2018 writing Team of Vipers: My 500 Extraordinary Days in the Trump White House. Many stories are told, some already well known to the public, some not. One buys this book, most likely, to gape at the colossal flameout spectacle that is Donald Trump, as with most things with Trump's name. Sims exposes the thoughtlessness, the chaos, the lack of empathy among his fellow insiders in the campaign and later in the White House, but he does not at all acknowledge the real consequences for ordinary Americans — there might as well be no world outside the Trump insider bubble, for all this narrative concerns itself with — and therefore falls far short of fully grappling with the ethical implications of his complicity.Previously, Sims was a journalist. "I had written tough stories, including some that helped take down a once-popular Republican governor in my home state," he says. "I had done my best to be acc…

It is not journalists' job to vet political nominees, but...?

The position of U.S. national intelligence director is open, following the resignation of Daniel Coats. John Ratcliffe withdrew his name from consideration on August 2, 2019, only five days after Trump nominated him. An article in The Guardian about why Trump picked Ratcliffe:Ratcliffe is a frequent Trump defender who fiercely questioned the former special counsel Robert Mueller during his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee hearing last week.Even as Mueller laid bare concerns that Russia was working to interfere with US elections again, Ratcliffe remained focused on the possibility that US intelligence agencies had overly relied on unverified opposition research in investigating the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia.Unfortunately for Ratcliffe, he had embellished his credentials. According to Vox: He had "frequently boasted about overseeing the arrest of 300 illegal immigrants in one day at a poultry plant in 2008," but the operation was much smaller and his role w…