Sharing a couple threads I spotted on Twitter.
First, here's Frank Figliuzzi, formerly a top FBI official, now a national security analyst for MSNBC, saying that Trump is behaving like a "barricaded subject" in a hostage negotiation. He says that Biden is handling the situation correctly, staying calm and allowing Trump an opportunity to vent, while letting Trump keep his options open for resolving the standoff "the easy way" rather than "the hard way."
On November 10, the New York Times published a large article explaining that no significant election fraud has been found. This has been the most secure U.S. election ever, according to a November 12 New York Times article.
Yet Trump has been refusing to cooperate with the Biden team (see these articles from CNN and Huffington Post). He's making the moves of a dictator (CNN). To the extent he ever performed normal presidential responsibilities, he has now stopped working altogether. (CNN) To maintain the illusion that his administration expects to continue, issued a directive that "any political appointee searching for a new job should be fired."
On November 11, Jennifer Rubin mentioned in the Washington Post that "six pre-election and seven post-election lawsuits by the Trump camp have all been tossed out" by judges who say that the allegations are not based in fact. "Interestingly," she notes, "Trump’s lawyers refuse to say before a real judge that they have found fraud or other reasons to overturn results." The problem, she says, is:
Trump is receiving support from a range of Republican figures, including Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who says congratulations to Biden are premature; a flock of members of Congress from Georgia, who baselessly attack their state’s Republican secretary of state and inexplicably claim their own election victories valid while Biden’s is fraudulent; Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who declares the transition will be to a “second Trump administration”; and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who perpetuates the fiction that the outcome is in dispute. The aim is not to steal an election, but to sow doubt about the legitimacy of our democracy — just as the Russians intend. These Republicans aim to keep their base in a constant state of anger and crazed denial.
On Friday, November 13, "nine cases in key states were denied or dropped in one day," CNN reported. The next day, in the evening, Trump tweeted that he was putting Rudy Giuliani in charge of the Trump campaign's legal fight. Giuliani replaces campaign adviser David Bossie, who, in addition to not being a lawyer, was diagnosed with COVID-19 soon after he was appointed to the role. On Monday, November 16, another four lawsuits were dropped.
On November 11, NBC reported that "there is a growing expectation among President Donald Trump’s advisers that he will never concede that he lost re-election, even after votes are certified in battleground states over the coming weeks," while other advisers believe that "the president is coming around to the fact that the election result won’t be reversed." Regarding Trump's lawsuits over the election, a White House official said, “It’s not wrong for the Biden team to call it theater.” A November 12 article from CNN found sources close to Trump who believe that Trump will indeed give up eventually.
Republican leaders are starting to give up on Trump's narrative and his false expectations for a win, according to a November 12 New York Times article.
On November 16, White House national security adviser Robert C. O’Brien said that Biden appears to have won.
Also on November 16, attorneys quit the Trump lawsuit in Pennsylvania. Trump then hired Marc Scaringi to represent him there. But this attorney doesn't seem to believe in the cause. Scaringi, a radio show host, had told his listeners on November 7: “In my opinion there really are no bombshells that are about to drop that will derail a Biden presidency including these lawsuits." Scaringi had also previously blogged that Biden was “president-elect” and “the 46th president," though he subsequently deleted the post.
By November 18, General Services Administrator Emily Murphy was still refusing to release transition funds. She says there is precedent to wait for some formal "ascertainment" of the election results; she also says she has received death threats. No legal process seems likely to change the election results at this point. "It's not clear what specific actions Murphy is waiting on before granting ascertainment," CNN reported, as "Murphy has not publicly said what the definitive line will be."
On November 19, state judges in Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia threw out more of Trump's lawsuits.
This “we’re letting Trump sort through his feelings” line is garbage. It’s about power and wealth and control, like all things the GOP do. Trump is a battering ram they can hide behind. None of this is about his feelings. It’s about power.
— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) November 14, 2020
Former top FBI official says Trump is acting like what FBI terms a "barricaded subject", hostage negotiation situation. pic.twitter.com/S2ImaWvRVq
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) November 10, 2020
This thread:
Soft coup is the phrase you're looking for. This doesn't look like what you maybe think of, when you think of a coup, but it is an attempt at a conspiracy-based soft coup. Before the election even happened, Trump announced his intent to do this, & began the conspiracy himself.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
And yes, Republicans supporting this are doing it because of Georgia. They want to keep their power over the Senate, and Georgia is where the possibility is. If they blow Georgia up, they keep the Senate.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
This is just to say that a coup looking like this is a thing that happens. This is a type of coup. No one is being hysterical when they say that. It's the correct word for someone laying down a conspiracy in order to illegally flip an election back to the losing party.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
Some coups are violent, & others are stealthy. This one's a weird combo. It's not secretive - Trump started saying this was what he'd do months ago. He had no evidence of fraud then, of course. He never has. He's always said he wouldn't accept defeat. That's what this looks like.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
In his - & other dictatorial - minds, defeat is impossible. There was never any version of a fair loss for him: to him, defeat itself is inherently unfair. He dropped mail vote fraud conspiracy groundwork, just in case, & built it up for months. It's always been for this purpose.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
But call it by its name. What we're seeing is an attempt at a soft or silent coup. Just "coup" is appropriate too. I'll use it in a sentence: The Trump Administration, and much of the GOP are currently attempting a coup.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
Note: coups etc. aren't my area of expertise. I'm a storytelling expert though (I've written a lot books, in a bunch of different genres) & the Trump administration is all storytelling. The storytelling re: mail-in voting has always been pointing at this set of plot points.
— Maria Dahvana Headley (@MARIADAHVANA) November 10, 2020
Also, this one:
OK. Now that the dust is clearing on the election, there's a thing us liberals, leftists, not-centrists, whateverthefuck we call ourselves, are going to have to work on: our storytelling. (Thread.)
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
It's not that the right is better at storytelling. It's that their stories are simpler, more viscerally satisfying. "A Black woman stole your job!" "They want your guns!" Easy, reductive us vs them, you in danger girl level stuff. Even when it's not true, it provokes a reaction.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
These stories are like snacks. They satisfy a (forbidden?) craving. They have good mouth-feel. They make you want more. Thing is, try to *live* on snacks and you'll die of malnutrition.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
The left's story is a meal. Some crave-able comfort food, but also stuff that's good for you.
These stories are like snacks. They satisfy a (forbidden?) craving. They have good mouth-feel. They make you want more. Thing is, try to *live* on snacks and you'll die of malnutrition.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
The left's story is a meal. Some crave-able comfort food, but also stuff that's good for you.
A lot of left analysis I'm seeing rt now disregards this. "We need to understand why these people love salt." Bitch, no, everybody loves salt, some of us just moderate. "We need to sell snacks, too!" That's an uphill climb -- and it elides the fact that snacks are *bad for you.*
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Leftist points *can* be distilled into simple visceral stories, sure. "Eat the rich." "Defund police." But they don't hit as hard bc they're shorthand for complex topics. Like kale chips -- superficially snacky, actually good for you, offputting to ppl who prefer potato chips.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Also? Ppl who choose to live on snacks aren't doing so for any rational reason. It's literally killing them. They're doing it anyway because it satisfies some other impulse: in-group approval, a sense of power over a complex and changing world. Snacks are soothing that way.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
You cannot reason with folks who've chosen to do something against their interest, because their interest isn't what *you* think it is. They probably know America is better off unified and equal... but ooh, it feels so good to hurt others.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Some folks just got raised wrong.
So I'm not concerned about them, personally. Folks like that might fix themselves, but *you're* not gonna do it. What concerns me is *leftists* falling for snack-style stories. Way too many of y'all buy into the right's "both sides" nonsense, or "white working class" rhetoric.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
(As a reminder, both sides are *not* equally bad, and Trump's base is actually wealthy white people. About half the working class is BIPoC and they are disproportionately disabled, queer, immigrant -- groups the right hates. "It's about the white working class" framing is a lie.)
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
And here is where the failure of storytelling kicks in. Why do leftists -- people who ostensibly believe in a balanced diet -- continually fall for this malnourished bullshit logic?
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Same reason right-wingers do: bc on some level these leftists prefer snacks to good nutrition.
We see it again and again -- reductive class analysis that ignores the impact of race and other intersections. White pundits who empathize with racists but find BIPoC equality terrifying ("cancel culture!!!1!"). Black male hip hop stars who throw their own people under the bus.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Some of this is human nature. We often draw causal connections that don't have much to do with logic (e.g. superstition). Some of it is culture. Capitalism is a doctrine of selfishness, after all, and most of us have been indoctrinated with it from childhood.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
But a lot of it is that many leftists have chosen false simplicity over the complex, often bitter flavors of truth. "Whiteness is the core of America's problems? That can't be true*. I'd rather believe [salty snack #1]."
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
*It can be. But it's more complex than "white ppl bad."
Somehow we have to get these folks to swallow "it's the racism, stupid" pills without choking on them and vomiting back Trumpian talking points.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
I have no solution for this, btw. I'm trying to tell good stories, but mine are kind of long and chewy. Not very snackable.
End of day, this is probably a question for marketing/PR people to answer, since their specialty is very short stories. But it's important to target those stories at the right audience. Not everybody likes everything, after all. My books aren't super-popular in the Western aisle.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
So, know your audience. Stop trying to sell wholesome meals to ppl who've chosen to live on chips -- hell, half the reason they're doing that is to spite you. Focus on folks who claim to want good food but are eating a lot of crap. Remind them that salt is not a food group.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
And more importantly, focus on those who already know the complex stories, but don't trust the storytellers. The BIPoC who don't vote completely get that it's the racism -- but they don't think leftist politicians do. Because the best-known leftist politicians *don't* get it.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
That's the danger of class reductionists & white liberal pundits who sound straight out of MLK's Letter From A Birmingham Jail -- more devoted to "order" than justice, constantly cautioning BIPoC to put their needs off for the greater good. Nobody likes a story with a bad ending.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
The great non-voting masses of America have fallen prey not only to voter suppression, but also the stories told by GOP/billionaire think tanks: voting is meaningless, both sides are bad, doesn't matter who's in charge, life will always suck. This is a narrative we must counter.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
And the way to do it is NOT with messages of conciliation toward fascists, or unity with bigots. Not by handwaving consequences because trials and equality are too hard. The way to do it is to SHOW people (don't tell!) that who they vote for matters. That justice is possible.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
We all want life to be better. But we have a chance right now to achieve the positive peace which is the presence of justice, to paraphrase MLK, and not just negative peace which is the absence of conflict. Elevate the powerless, not the powerful. Focus on justice, not "unity."
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Put some fucking Republicans in jail. (Prob the biggest reason I can't commit to prison abolition; I want these mfs to die in prison.) Put ICE officers in jail if they raped or abused immigrants. Put bad cops in jail.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
When we lack stories to tell, actions speak loudest.
And a big, important story we need to be telling right now is just how terrifying the vote is, to fascists. Fortunately they've helped tell that story themselves, by repeatedly attacking people's ability to vote. It's clearly important. Leftists need to double down on that.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
So that's all I got, from one storyteller to the many others out there. Hope it helps.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
Belated add, since some are tossing around lefty snack stories now: again, those are a hard sell bc nuance reduces poorly & capitalism indocs the opposite. But my suggestion: "You're better off if your neighbor is, too." Doesn't rhyme, not very snacky. But that's the gist.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) November 8, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment