Because of course he does
When someone is a expert in public health facts and values public health outcomes, they don't want to participate in a disinfotainment war. It degrades the dignity of their actual knowledge, and it may contribute to bad outcomes. Who "wins/loses" the debate is subjective and is not the point. Even if the audience at home judges that the scientist sounded better (which is unlikely), the entire event is a loss for science.
The audience wants to know who won this "debate," for the same reason they want to know who won an Oscar or an Olympic medal. It's part of knowing how to make and join conversations in society. In the process of trying to "keep up" with the current megalogues, however, they begin to assume that listening to the show would be a path to wisdom. The show's producers don't care if anyone absorbs that idea, as long as they listen to the show. It's the wrong idea.
BTW, RFK is transphobic.
"In a recently unearthed video interview, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the noted anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist and a Democratic challenger of President Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection bid, claimed chemicals in the water supply are turning boys trans.
“A lot of the problems we see in kids, particularly boys, it’s probably underappreciated how much of that is coming from chemical exposures, including a lot of sexual dysphoria that we’re seeing,” the scion of the Kennedy political dynasty said during an interview with Canadian psychologist and ring-wing pundit Jordan Peterson."
— "RFK Jr. claims chemicals in the water are turning boys transgender," Christopher Kane, Washington Blade, June 19, 2023
Also BTW — this is a July 17 update — as shown by "Kennedy's first FEC filing, the lion's share of Kennedy's biggest donors have previously only donated to Republicans." (Judd Legum, Popular Information)
On Angry White Men: Tracking White Supremacy (June 18, 2023), there's a list of all the anti-vaccine conspiracy theorists who have appeared on RFK Jr.'s podcast. He's made 143 episodes since 2021.
By the way, to follow up on an idea above: Conspiracy theories give simple explanations for complex phenomena, and thus make some people feel reassured. Similarly, people want definitions of themselves. These don't even require conspiracy theories — which are elaborate stories that boil down to relatively simple explanations — but just dictionary-style definitions. These definitions can be used as part of conspiracy theories.
When one commenter seemed not to understand Silver's analogy, another paraphrased it:
In other words, Joe Rogan knows his side has a big advantage, completely apart from the factual evidence.
Sometimes at least one of the proposed interlocutors is a bad person
The interlocutors
They have to share enough common ground to have a conversation. They need to share the same sense of reality.
As well as the same values intertwined with that sense of reality.
Each of them has to have a relevant knowledge base, even if those bases have significant differences.
If the interlocutors interrupt and talk over each other, then change the topic, how can that be winning?
Why does the interlocutor with less expertise pressure the more knowledgeable one to debate?
Why would a non-scientist want to debate a scientist about science?
The audience
A mass audience doesn't share a scientist's expertise either. They may not even share the same awareness of what facts might be relevant, fidelity to truth about those basic areas, or active pursuit of advanced knowledge.
They do, however, become zealous, to the point of harassing the participants outside the debate.
If someone's making unfounded claims of knowledge and epistemic purity, public debate can be a performative response to help smoke that out. It doesn't "resolve intellectual disputes." It resolves annoying performativity disputes.
The Political News Media Still Doesn’t Know How To Interview Trump, So I’m Going To Show Them, Todd Lombardo, Substack, September 26, 2023:
"In my previous Substack, I described four theories about how the political news media is getting it wrong in covering MAGA more broadly, and Donald Trump specifically: bothsidesism, doomsdaying, access journalism, and fascist-normalizing."
In this post, these ideas are applied retroactively to a Trump interview.
RFK Jr. will run as an independent in 2024
In October 2023, RFK Jr. announced he would stop challenging Biden in the primary and instead run as an independent.
Robert Reich writes, distinguishing the father from the son (Substack, October 10, 2023):
"I worked in Robert F. Kennedy’s Senate office in 1967. ... Robert F. Kennedy would never have suggested or even thought that a deadly virus was targeted at certain races. He wouldn’t have repeated the trope, dating at least to the Middle Ages, that Jews unleashed a plague on non-Jews. ... RFK Jr is not an independent. He is a right-wing tool being used to help elect Trump. His candidacy has been backed by a PAC that also funds Marjorie Taylor Greene and George Santos."
www.motherjones.com/politics/202... Obviously this is not a serious person, but it’s amazing you can just run on what amounts to forced institutionalization of neurodivergent people in 2024
— David is a Downer (@davidlanzrath.bsky.social) Jul 25, 2024 at 3:43 PM
[image or embed]
RFK Jr. says he placed a dead bear cub in Central Park 10 years ago, Aaron Pellish, CNN, August 4, 2024
Do Republicans like debate?
I dunno, maye they do, but then why does their leading candidate insist on no debates?
Trump Demands That The RNC Stop Hosting Debates For His Rivals Or Be Revamped: NOW!!! The coup-attempting former president has skipped all three debates to date but has been getting more agitated about them as the GOP primaries draw closer. S.V. Date, Huffington Post, Nov 20, 2023.
They never wanted to debate, just make unfunny jokes...
Joe Rogan Mocks Trans People And COVID In Netflix Stand-Up, And The Internet Is Fed Up: The controversial podcaster's new comedy special, "Burn the Boats," is being met with criticism. Jazmin Tolliver, HuffPost, Aug 5, 2024
Read this article by Julia Serano
Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth Is Neither New nor Experimental: A Timeline and Compilation of Studies (32-min read), Julia Serano, Medium, May 16, 2023.
The article came to my attention because she tweeted on June 19, 2023: "since we're talking about anti-vaxxers & calls to "debate me", I will add that anti-trans activists use this exact same playbook. you can't "debate" a scientific consensus, b/c it's not based on one study & can't be undone w/individual "questions/concerns""
RFK is now doing some complicated spoiler stuff
I regret to inform you the RFK Jr. is back at SCOTUS, this time asking to be taken off the Wisconsin ballot — after previously, unsuccessfully, asking to be added to the NY ballot. He claims he's going to do something at SCOTUS re: Michigan, too. www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) October 24, 2024 at 12:20 PM
[image or embed]
77 Nobel Prize Winners Write Message To The Senate: Don’t Confirm RFK Jr. "The leader of DHHS should continue to nurture and improve — not threaten — these important and highly respected institutions." Nick Visser, HuffPost, Dec 10, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment