Sunday, December 31, 2023

Cis-supremacists aren't persuadable

Three days ago, in a Substack note, re: the possibility of persuading governments to implement an Israel–Gaza ceasefire:

Joshua P. Hill: People who complain protests aren’t persuading people have no answer for why our government hasn’t responded to the clear will of the majority. If persuasion were sufficient the U.S. government would be demanding a ceasefire. It’s not, so people graduated to disruption.
Substack note

In reply:

A.R. Moxon: I feel like 'persuasion' is just a canard in this setting. People who need to be convinced to support the most basic and obvious calls for justice, or will be persuaded away from that support by inconvenience, are not persuadable people, and their demands to be convinced seem motivated not out of a true desire to be convinced to support justice, but rather a desire to establish themselves as the ones who must be convinced before justice can be achieved.
Substack note
A.R. Moxon: A.R. Moxon: Once they have established themselves as the ones who must be convinced, they can make a show of not being convinced, then use the fact that they haven’t been convinced as proof that the call for justice is unconvincing, then use the notion that the call for justice is unconvincing as a rationale to ignore the clear moral demand.
Substack note

This is true in general, and it's also how a lot of transphobia works. The transphobe posits themselves (or some general idea of a normal, ordinary cis person, whom they claim to represent) as the arbiter of human reasonableness. The transphobe says: "Everything trans people say sounds unreasonable to me. Therefore, trans people's arguments are objectively unsound, and their claims are wrong. That's why trans people are unpersuasive to me and unpersuasive to just about everyone else too."

If this kind of person cared about whose arguments (or existence, or communications style, etc.) persuade whom, they'd look at the evidence. Lots of cis people say "I'm fine with trans people, thanks. Actually, I find trans people quite persuasive." Yet the transphobe discards that personal feedback, as well as the obvious fact that trans people simply are part of society, as well as any sociological data about what kinds of people accept whom and in what numbers.

This kind of transphobe is not a persuadable person. They're primarily interested in perpetually reasserting their own supremacy and their paternalistic prerogative to decide what's right for other people. In their mind and heart, any desire for equal rights and liberation for others is a distant second.

'No one ever asked women'

Germaine Greer wrote in The Whole Woman (1999):

"No one ever asked women if they recognized sex-change males as belonging to their sex or considered whether being obliged to accept MTF transsexuals as women was at all damaging to their identity or self-esteem."

To this, Serano notes that Greer's very use of a term like "sex-change males" shows that "she feels entitled to gender us in whatever way she feels is appropriate." She also uses the term "women" to refer only to cis women when the context of the sentence calls for a distinction between cis women and trans women. Furthermore, "Greer grants these [cis] women cissexual privilege when she suggests that they (along with her) are equally entitled to be consulted about whether transsexual women should belong to their sex or not. It is particularly telling that Greer uses the word 'asked' in this context. After all, nobody in our society ever asks for permission to belong to one gender or another; rather, we just are who we are and other people make assumptions about our gender accordingly." She's using "different standards of legitimacy" for cis and trans people, and thus she's "producing and exercising cissexual privilege."

(Julia Serano, Whipping Girl, "Chapter 8: Dismantling Cissexual Privilege," first published 2007, 3rd edition published 2024.)

By the way, a description for an IAI Live talk ("The Final Wave," July 19, 2021) said of Greer that "liberal feminism, "combined with cancel culture ... has seen Germaine Greer take early retirement, J.K. Rowling denounced by progressives worldwide and the UK Employments Courts forced to protect some feminist beliefs in law." The "early retirement" remark is odd, as Greer was at this time 82 years old, and had just voluntarily moved into an aged-care home because she could no longer live independently in her house.

Victim-blaming on a metaphysical level

A.R. Moxon talks about this in the context of in-person protests. Often, victims are pre-blamed depending on what side they're on. This is evidence of supremacy:

"...whenever supremacists commit acts of violence against demonstrators for justice, the blame for the violence gets attributed to all those who march for justice, not to the supremacists responsible or to the underlying injustice that made the demonstration necessary. This is a state of affairs that makes it impossible for a demonstration for supremacy to ever be considered intrinsically violent, and impossible for a demonstration for justice to ever be considered intrinsically peaceful. A litmus test for institutional supremacy if ever there was one."
A.R. Moxon, interviewed by Parker Molloy (Patreon), May 30, 2024

No comments:

Post a Comment

In case you missed it

Have you seen inside the book 'To Climates Unknown'?

The alternate history novel To Climates Unknown by Arturo Serrano was released on November 25, the 400th anniversary of the mythical First ...