I wrote articles — "Quit Twitter?" and "We May Not Have Twitter Tomorrow" — on Medium.
Umair Haque, writing on Medium, October 29, 2022:
"Racial slurs are hate, and “free speech” is about government interference, not your so-called right to hate someone. ...much of the rest of the world bans hate speech precisely because it has consequences. It manifests in violence. Hate is the intent to hurt someone, to do harm them, and in that sense, it is a form of violence itself, because it begs and calls for the real thing."
Elon Musk tweet, November 9, 2022:
This has been happening:
.@yoyoel says new frameworks are coming incl. “reducing reach” of certain content.
— Nandini Jammi (@nandoodles) November 9, 2022
Elon: “Big diff b/w freedom of speech vs. freedom of reach.”
Elon’s bringing back shadow banning, baby!
Elon: “We need to be tolerant of views we don’t agree w/, but they don’t need to be amplified.”
— Nandini Jammi (@nandoodles) November 9, 2022
Who is “we” in this equation? What is the values framework here?
Allowing deadnaming is literally the top content moderation policy that Musk is allegedly proposing. If you can squeeze him via advertising boycotts, he might walk that back. If you buy Twitter Blue, you embolden him to enact it. This has severe impacts on people irl.
— A. H. (@a_h_reaume) November 11, 2022
Notable that this verification clusterfuck is happening in large part because online contrarians decided to pretend that “blue check” was synonymous with “elite liberal scold” rather than with “account from a user whose identity has been confirmed”
— andi zeisler (@andizeisler) November 10, 2022
someone is likely going to make a blockchain or extension that allows you to block all the $8 verified ppl. which could create pressure on everyone else to *not* sign up for it, lest they be blocked... https://t.co/94nBt97DEr
— Julia Serano (@JuliaSerano) November 10, 2022
How'd it turn out? In April 2024 news, Musk will change the policy so "he'll be giving away blue checks to prominent users, but still offering the rest of us plebeians the option to buy one."
"'I think it’s an admission that (Musk) still doesn’t really understand what the value of the blue check has always been … the value in it was that when you saw a blue check on a person’s account, you knew that the person was who they were claiming to be,' said Jason Goldman, Twitter’s former head of product, who left the company in 2010. 'The value that accrued from that was for Twitter as a whole, not for the person who had a blue check mark.'"
— Elon Musk’s X is back to giving out free blue checks. It’s no surprise they were a tough sell, Clare Duffy, CNN, April 4, 2024
1/ Just want to put this news in plain language for people.
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) November 10, 2022
Senior people at Twitter have resigned in the last 48 hours. We now now why. They said in private Slack channels that @elonmusk is so desperate to recoup his money, he’s taking crazy risks with YOUR privacy and safety.
2/ Right now, Twitter is extremely hackable. That puts every user here at extreme risk for DM leaks, identity theft and surveillance.
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) November 10, 2022
Elon doesn’t care. He wants his money. So they resigned. And top lawyers told Twitter employees to get whistleblower protections.
3/ The FCC just announced they are investigating. They have power to fine Twitter billions.
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) November 10, 2022
Add this to historical pattern of @elonmusk endangering the public by unleashing a half-baked autopilot on public streets without basic technology, and one concludes he feels invincible.
According to messages shared in Twitter Slack, Twitter’s CISO, chief privacy office, and chief compliance officer all resigned last night.
— Casey Newton (@CaseyNewton) November 10, 2022
An employee says it will be up to engineers to “self-certify compliance with FTC requirements and other laws.”
“All of this is extremely dangerous for our users,” the message says. “Given that the FTC can (and will!) fine Twitter BILLIONS of dollars pursuant to the FTC Consent Order, extremely detrimental to Twitter’s longevity as a platform. Our users deserve so much better than this.”
— Casey Newton (@CaseyNewton) November 10, 2022
The message ends with a link to https://t.co/ezZt0Ckd5Z
— Casey Newton (@CaseyNewton) November 10, 2022
Strong statement from FTC, following the security and privacy departures at Twitter: "We are tracking recent developments at Twitter with deep concern. No CEO or company is above the law, and companies must follow our consent decrees."
— Cat Zakrzewski (@Cat_Zakrzewski) November 10, 2022
"Our revised consent order gives us new tools to ensure compliance, and we are prepared to use them.”
— Cat Zakrzewski (@Cat_Zakrzewski) November 10, 2022
More in today's developing story w/ @josephmenn https://t.co/49Ft7o3qF6
— Cat Zakrzewski (@Cat_Zakrzewski) November 10, 2022
Also just a reminder to those watching the rapid changes to checkmarks on Twitter: That new consent order requires Twitter to assess the privacy and security risks of any product changes or new features.
— Cat Zakrzewski (@Cat_Zakrzewski) November 10, 2022
Oh, hey
Another fun edition of how it started vs how it’s going. youtu.be/LuZOLCvCbWo?...
— Blue Sedition Podcast (@blue-sedition.com) October 8, 2024 at 10:23 AM
[image or embed]
No comments:
Post a Comment